Resumes have been important to writers forever. Writing a strong one could really help you land better gigs.
I don’t think a resume is important for writers anymore.
- I don’t believe anyone actually reads resumes anymore. I’ll send my resume out on job ads that say a resume is an absolute requirement. Otherwise, I’d never think to include it in my pitches or marketing to prospective clients. I believe even the job-ad posters skip right over the resume and look at your pitch or your clips, anyway.
- Resumes are boring. Seriously. “Joe freelanced for Modern Refrigeration Magazine from 2002-2009″…zzzzz. Is that really putting you in the best light?
- Resumes don’t tell much about how good of a writer you are. You might have worked as a staff writer somewhere for years, where you were always considered the weak link in the writing team.
- Increasingly, markets don’t care about your track record. If you’ve got a couple of solid clip links you can email, you’re good, especially with online markets. Many editors and marketing managers don’t have time to study your entire career — they read a couple clips and decide you’re good for it.
For now, a short bio. When I’m asked for a resume, unless it’s a job-ad robot Web site where I can’t progress without attaching my resume file, I direct the prospect to look at my short bio on my Writer site. I believe it is far more compelling and enlightening in describing my background. It’s less than a page long, despite my having been at this for about 20 years, so it mercifully sums up a lot, fast.
The bio format allows you to simply tell the story of your writer’s journey — where you’ve written for, the type of work you do, the type of writing you enjoy.
People like to read stories way more than they like to read lists of jobs you’ve had previously. The bio format also makes it easier to throw any awards you’ve won up near the top. I find many prospects are easily impressed by awards, so getting them up high is a good move.
Also, the bio format allows you to top your story with the best credits you’ve got. There’s no compulsion to put things in chronological order.
For instance, I once wrote a couple articles for the college edition of the Wall Street Journal (before the Internet, darnit). I’m going to say it was about a decade ago. But in a bio, I could put that in the first line, since it’s such a smokin’ hot credit. On my resume, it’s so long ago it wouldn’t even make the second page — which as we all know is a page nobody reads.
Beyond bios
In the future, both resumes and bios look to be headed for the scrap heap. New, cooler ways of acquainting people with what we do are emerging.
One I recently learned about is Labels.io. Still in beta, this site allows you to present your experience in a concise, nifty graphical package. You create a bunch of quick tabs labeled by past client. You give it a top paragraph to introduce the package, and you’re set. Load in some key words on jobs you’d like to be found for and presto — it’s easy for prospects to locate you and verify you have the experience they want with a couple of quick clicks.
I’m confident Labels won’t be the only graphical alternative-resume idea we’ll see in the next couple of years.
As someone who’s had to review resumes and hire writers myself (edited an alternative paper in San Pedro, Calif., for a year or so early in my career), I can say I look forward to the changes. Resumes are dull, and at this point the Internet ought to offer a better way for us to get hired.
This post originally appeared on the WM Freelance Writer’s Connection.
Photo via Flickr user