Content Mill Update: What Demand Studios’ Implosion Means for Writers

Carol Tice

Businessman With Sales ChartRemember what it was like to write online content in 2006? Back then, there was a ton of opportunity for writers willing to crank out boatloads of hastily written, low-paid content for content mills.

These sites got a ton of traffic off the key words in their posts. Visitors would click the ads they put on those pages, and the sites could make a fortune.

One of the most successful pioneers of this mass-content model was Demand Studios. When its parent company, Demand Media, went public in 2011, there was a brief moment when Demand was worth more than the New York Times.

Those days are long gone. Google soon got hip to the lack of value to online readers of most content-mill writing. It started changing its algorithm to exclude such sites from its search results. (When’s the last time you got a link to eHow on page one of a Google search? Yeah.)

The company’s founder and CEO quit in October 2013, having pocketed his millions from the stock offering.

If you’ve been wondering what’s happened since, let me give you a content mill update here.

The short version: Mass SEO-focused content sites are in a death spiral. If you earn much of your money writing for mills or big revenue-share sites, you need a new game plan.

The shift from quantity to quality

In its fight to stay the top search engine, Google has moved aggressively to make sure its search results remain highly useful. That’s created a sea change in what’s important in online writing.

Now, you can have huge traffic on your site and a ton of content, but if that content isn’t highly useful, you may still not end up with a profitable site. Readers don’t stay, and they increasingly don’t click on ads, anyway.

All the websites that depend on this model — mass content to get ad clicks — are in terrible trouble. If you’ve noticed a downturn in how many mill assignments are available, or that pay is getting smaller, there’s a reason.

Content mills don’t make money, so they can’t pay you any, either.

Charting the decreasing Demand

Let’s look at what’s happened to investors’ feelings about Demand Media since it went public in fall 2011 at $17 a share. Yes, it’s just one content mill, but one of the biggest survivors (Associated Content merged into Yahoo! and then shut down last year, for instance). You can extrapolate that if things are going wrong at Demand, other mills with a similar business model are experiencing the same thing.

Back when, Demand investors thought this was an exciting, disruptive business that was going to transform publishing forever. On its debut, the stock shot up. But here’s what their stock has done in the past six months:

Screen Shot 2015-02-06 at 12.51.07 PM

Why is Demand worth so much less than before? Because traffic is shrinking, and revenue and profits are vaporizing as a result. As of the end of September (freshest data available), Demand had made $108 million in 2014 — and declared a loss on that of nearly $250 million.

By contrast, Demand made over $158 million in the same period in 2013, and its loss was under $9 million. It was a struggling company then. Now, it’s an imploding company.

Why the impressive losses? Simple: Less traffic.

Here are traffic charts for Demand Studios and its eHow site from Alexa:

Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 1.25.43 PM

Screen Shot 2015-02-06 at 12.42.29 PM

(Yes, I know Alexa isn’t super-accurate, but these charts are looking similar on SEMRush and other tools, too.)

Notice how those declining traffic curves resemble the stock-price chart? That’s because as traffic goes down on an ad-based site, less money comes in. A lot less. That means the stock is worth less, too.

To sum up, if you cleared $100 from your blog last year, you netted more than Demand Studios. If you ever wondered why content mills don’t pay writers more, it’s because even paying you a pittance, they’re not making a profit.

Closing time

What happens when a company loses that much money? Cutbacks and desertions. At Demand, a couple months after the bad loss news came out last fall, it meant the company closed all their foreign offices and stopped assigning articles for their non-English websites.

And this month, more executives jumped ship to other, more stable companies. When people with inside information, who’re earning a good salary inside a company, are stampeding out the door — leaving a company that probably gave them stock options — you know the outlook isn’t good.

Look back far enough, and you’ll see this was always a pipe dream. Demand only made a profit in one of the past five years, and it was a pittance compared to the losses they’ve racked up. Masses of garbage content driving ad revenue was never a business — it was a theory that didn’t pan out.

And Demand knows it. That’s why they now own ecommerce marketplaces Society6, Pluck, and Saatchi Art.

They’re diversifying. Moving on to other types of business that make money. Are you?

It’s not just Demand

In case you think plummeting traffic is just a problem at this particular content mill, and you could simply flee to some other mass-content platform that’s still doing well, let me show you a couple other traffic charts.

These sites aren’t mills, but also make their revenue off ads placed on masses of quickie content:

Screen Shot 2015-02-06 at 12.42.42 PM

Screen Shot 2015-02-13 at 1.38.13 PM

An era is ending here, both for these sites, and for writers reliant on income from them.

Quickly written articles that are mostly SEO fodder for search-engine robots to read don’t work anymore.  In the future, you can expect there to be less and less opportunity to write these, and less and less pay for whatever assignments of this type remain.

The main takeaway: This downturn in traffic on mass quick-content sites is not a fad, a fluke, or a momentary aberration. It’s a downward spiral that will not be reversed. Google continues to update its algorithms, on a mission to exclude these sorts of sites from search results.

Writing for content mills is a dying occupation.

The good news for writers

This may be upsetting news, if you are currently earning a decent portion of your income from content mills.

But there is an enormous silver lining.

With the fall of junk mass content comes the rise of in-depth, high-quality content that readers find super-useful. Companies will still use content to get visitors to their sites, because it’s way cheaper and more effective than traditional advertising.

If you can write it, there is going to be ample opportunity to earn well online in the coming years. Coming up, companies will be competing to post the most valuable content possible on their sites. Because that’s how businesses get traffic, find new customers and make sales.

It’s time to stop signing into a content-mill dashboard, and learn how to prospect and find better clients. They’re the ones who’ll be hiring writers for fat, better-paying content projects in the months and years to come.

What’s your prediction for the future of content mills? Share your take in the comments.

Get Great Freelance Clients

 

 

70 Comments

  1. Linda H

    I agree with Carol that trolling Craigslist won’t get your well-paying jobs, at least 98% of the time it won’t. I don’t even troll anymore. My key marketing tools are my LinkedIn profile, which needs updating, and my website, which is also in need of a tune up. Yet from both those resources I’ve recently landed a website content writing gig and a ghostwriting gig that are both going to be great opportunities and will pay well. I often get calls from people demanding quick turnarounds on their “typing needs” where they offer me $50 for the job. I say my hourly rate is $65 and if they scoff and repeat the $50/hr figure I make sure they’re aware I charge $65/hr. They often hang up. They want a lot for little and I don’t work that way.

    Job seekers are given the same advice–don’t troll job boards, research your markets and find the place you want to work then approach them. This lands clients better paying jobs that are of higher quality than those they find trolling job boards.

    I probably lose a lot of work because my website is weak, but at the same time I land a lot of work because of it–and the jobs pay well, not a little. My goal is to earn what Carol describes that she earns. I’m not there yet, but I’m getting there. It comes from researching my markets and working the findings. You can’t earn the same kind of money from trolling job boards, people listing those jobs aren’t interested in paying good wages they are interested in finding someone who’ll dole out for little so they can reap the rewards.

    Market smart and earn, it’s what differentiates well-paid successful freelancers from those who enjoy writing but can’t survive.

  2. Sean

    I am so glad that I didn’t fall for the content mills site. I just can’t see how you can make a living that way at a cut throat wage. People need to eat.

  3. Gary Cunnane

    Thanks Carol, for the encouraging news. I am finding two trends as I search daily for new opportunities. First, there are far less ads in Craigslist, Indeed and other sites, placed by obvious content mills. That is a good thing. I also feel that their are a great many former content writers to compete with when a real potential client posts an ad for a writer. I used to get a response, with much higher frequency, two years ago, than I do today. I feel that is because standing out among the hoards is becoming more difficult. Many content writers are applying for positions that they may not be qualified for, but think they are, creating a myriad where the shining stars are harder to spot for those who seek quality writers. In addition many former and current mill writers are still willing to work at a lower rate tightening the competition and lowering the average rate in the US.

    • Carol Tice

      The trend of more writers competing on ads…just means it’s time to stop looking at ads and find your own clients. Most good writing gigs are never advertised. I think many former mill writers are going to move on to doing something else entirely for a living, if they only had basic “SEO article writing” skills.

    • Gary Cunnane

      That is not necessarily true. If I am a lawyer or roofing company and need a writer for articles to improve my SEO I will advertise for one. That is how I found two of my best clients, from an ad. Here is a writer who substantiates this and gives some great advice. http://creativegenius.hubpages.com/hub/Search-for-Freelance-Writing-Jobs
      My own client needed more than just me to fill the needs of his multiple websites. He ran a couple ads and received replies from over one hundred “experienced” writers. More than he could deal with. After tweaking his requirements, that number was reduced by 50 percent, but still overwhelming. My advice to him was to look on LinkedIn.
      Ignoring ads for a freelance content writer is ignoring a valuable resource. Granted, I have acquired clients from recommendations and at least a couple by approaching them directly. I am not and never have been a mill writer. I did start out working for mini mills which call themselves web developers or marketing companies, but they are not mills per se.
      People who have made money in the past as writers are not going to walk away easily if a source dries up. They do it because they like it, in many cases, and will try keep up. If I quit when things dried up, as they did at least once, I would simply be a quitter and not a writer.

    • Carol Tice

      Well, I certainly agree with that writer you linked to that if you ARE going to spend time trolling Craigslist, you have to learn to do it in a very efficient way that cuts right to the gigs you want.

      Gary, I’d wager that your idea of a ‘best’ client and mine are very different. For instance, I got offered $500 a blog post this week, which is roughly what I’m averaging these days, $3500 for short business-plan projects, and I get more than $1 a word for articles. None of these clients come from ads.

      Yes, every once in a while someone great wanders onto Craigslist because they haven’t heard it’s a cesspit. But it’s so rare. Your time is usually more productively spent doing your own prospecting — or that’s what I found in my analysis of my own marketing back in 2010. I got some OK clients, but they were never my best clients, from mass ads. Niche online job boards were better. But ultimately, strong inbound marketing (great writer website and LinkedIn profile, people seeing my post on big blogs) and prospecting yielded better-paying work for better companies and more enjoyable projects.

      Try it, you’ll like it!

Related Posts

You CAN Write a Query Letter That Gets a “Yes”: 5 Resources

Freelance writer getting a gig after learning to write a query letter.

Love them or hate them, queries are one of the most important marketing tools for any freelancer who wants to write for magazines. And the skills you learn from writing a good query letter also help business writers and copywriters pitch their potential clients.

If you’ve been sending queries off into space and never getting a reply, you may think it’s impossible to break into new magazines. But it’s not true! Editors are always looking for new talent.

To help you learn to write a query letter that will get you the gig, we’ve pulled together a collection of five of our best posts on pitching:

Can’t Write? Try These 9 Ideas for Writing Motivation

It’s the bane of every freelance writer’s life: You know you need to sit yourself down and get some writing done, but nothing happens. The writing motivation just isn’t there. Sometimes, you can't even make yourself sit down with the computer -- even if you...