Can Revenue Share Writing Still Pay? We Investigate


Can Revenue Share Writing Still Pay? We Investigate.

Online offers for revenue share writing gigs are ubiquitous. They’ve been around since the early days of the Internet.

If you’ve been looking for writing jobs, you’ve probably seen the ads for this type of work: Get published and make money by submitting articles on any topic you like.

Sounds pretty good, right?

If you’re a veteran writer who knows how to write compelling copy, or can churn out content, maybe revenue share writing could be a stable source of income.

In theory, it’s possible. After all, millions of people are online, and there’s a niche audience for every imaginable topic you might be interested in writing about.

But before you sign up, tap into your creative energy, and start cranking out content for a revenue share writing site, you need to know a few things.

How revenue share writing really works

Revenue share is a business model that relies on freelance writers to create content to drive website traffic. But instead of getting paid flat-rate fees, you get paid based on the number of views, or more commonly, on a percentage of clicks made on ads placed next to your articles.

Ever wonder if this is a good way to make money as a freelance writer? We tracked down all the details. Google has changed what it values and ranks highly in search over the years, and that’s changed the outlook for revenue-share sites.

Can revenue share writing still pay? Here’s what we found:

Flat fees vs. payouts based on traffic

Very few revenue share writing sites pay any type of flat fee or even a flat fee plus a percentage bonus based on traffic or clicks.

In the early days of revenue share writing, the payout promises were pretty big. And a small number of writers did make a chunk of change. But many writers who hoped to use these sites to finance a new car discovered the only new car they could afford was on the aisles of Toys R Us.

And in some cases, you may not get paid at all, like writers who produced volumes of content under a revenue sharing agreement for Guardian Liberty Voice.

But let’s say you do your homework and find a revenue share writing site that isn’t ripping people off. Should you sign on the virtual dotted line and start writing?

Hold on. Besides the payout “scheme,” which is actually what one revenue share writing site calls it, there’s at least one other problem with this business model.

Think about this: How many sites do you read that have tons of ads? If you’re like me, not many. But that’s where most content created for revshare sites ends up.

Google’s algorithms don’t like these ad-heavy sites. As a result, many revenue share writing sites have changed their business model or shut down completely in the past few years.

Revshare sites that pay

A few sites, however, are still using the revenue-sharing model. Check out the sites we found still operating this way and what you can expect to earn.

  • Hubpages. This site acquired Squidoo, another well-known revenue sharing site, in 2014. It has the highest Alexa ranking of the revenue share writing sites listed here. Site owners didn’t respond to repeated interview requests. However, the owners do publish instructions and guidelines for writers. Money is earned, as through many sites, through Adsense or similar programs. Writers keep 60 percent of the revenue and Hubpages keeps 40 percent.
    • An interesting poll on the site asks how many writers earn more than $1 a day. The results:
    • 45 percent of the writers said they earned less than $1 a day — about $30 a month.
    • 24 percent said they earned more than $1.
    • 31 percent said they’d rather not say.
  • McGaw/Harlow sites. [NOTE: This entire family of sites is now gone.] Founders Danielle McGaw and Michelle Harlow run seven revenue share writing sites, including Listofied, Honest Reviewz, Trendzic and Craft Closet. But in an interview with McGaw, she primarily discussed their most popular revenue share writing sites:
    • Writedge launched in 2014. Currently, the site has 4,591 subscribers and over 200 approved writers. However, only 157 writers have submitted at least three articles, with 30 publishing at least 50 articles or more.
    • Daily Two Cents also started in 2014. About 50 authors have written at least 50 articles each, with just a few writing more than 100 articles. The site has 5,241 subscribers.
    • The Daily Voice launched in late 2015. Thirteen writers cover specific “beats,” but write in other categories as well. Writers average $10 to $60 a month, says McGaw. But added that she didn’t know how much the writers on other sites average, since they manage their own Adsense accounts.
  • Writer Town. Owner Elvis Michael says writers pay $1 a month to get access to a curated list of writing jobs on the site he’s been running since 2013. Freelancers can also create content for Writer Town on writing, blogging and general freelance topics and earn through revenue sharing. Michael said the site has 2,300 members and counting. While he could not speak for other writers, he said he personally averaged $83 a month over a six-month period in 2014.
  • Blasting News. Last year, we wrote about Blasting News not paying their writers under it’s revenueshare-only pay agreement. We asked co-founder Massimiliano Aliverti to respond, and after many months, we received a reply. Now, Aliverti says, writers earn a minimum of $15 per article that reaches 500 views, plus revenue sharing profits for more traffic.
  • Infobarrel. This revenue share writing site launched in 2008 after two friends, Ryan McKenzie and Kevin Hinton, dreamed up the idea over a game of raquetball. InfoBarrel now has 88,000 registered members and generates 2 million monthly visitors. Writers earn 75 percent of the revenue generated from the display ads on articles. We reached out to site administrators and writers to learn more about earning potential, but received no response.
  • Redgage is another revenue share writing site that promises payouts for generating traffic. But you’ll need to do more than just write content. The Redgage model rewards writers for social media activity, in addition to generating content and traffic. But it’s unclear how much you can make. Both site administrators and site writers we reached out to didn’t respond to questions about pay.

Revshare sites that no longer pay

Though revshare once seemed like it might offer good passive income for writers and a way to earn in retirement, at this point it seems to be a shrinking opportunity. Many of these sites have shut down, ending all hope of ongoing income for their writers.

For instance, here’s a quick roundup of once-popular sites that are no longer operating or that have stopped paying on a revshare model:

  • Helium Network was a long-time player in revenue share writing until 2014. Now it’s a platform that connects freelancers with clients that need copy. If you’re selected for a project, you negotiate the rates with the client, and Helium gets a cut.
  • MapQuest. This direction-finding site was using a revenue sharing model at until December 2016. However, company officials recently announced a pay-by-article model for travel-related content in select cities. Rates are $25 to $100 per accepted post.
  • Bubblews. If you were banking on this revenue share writing site to create passive income, you’ll need to make other plans. A message on its site states that it shut down after three years. “The climate for display advertising has drastically changed and made it impossible for us to sustain the business model and operations.”
  • Suite 101 launched in 1996 as a site to encourage fiction and nonfiction writers to show off their talent. Ten years later, Suite 101 was bought by Media Inc. and created a revshare program to generate more revenue from its 4 million readers. But it wouldn’t last. Suite 101 CEO Michael Kedda went silent on thousands of writers, and the revshare program shut down in 2013. But it wasn’t entirely dead…yet. Kedda bought the remnants of Suite 101, renamed the business Suite Media Inc., and launched a new site at in 2014. But that site has gone dark, too.
    “I wrote for Suite 101 for almost four years and contributed over 220 articles,” says freelance writer Harvey Craft of Lexington, Ky. “When they made their last change, continuing contributing writers were no longer paid.”
  • Triond is another revenue share writing site that once hired thousands of contract writers and generated millions of page views. It eventually folded by failing to keep up with Google’s ever-changing algorithims. At one time, Triond appeared in many articles as one of the best revenue-sharing sites for writers, but it officially closed in 2016.

Paid in pennies: The verdict on revenue share writing

Can revenue share writing still pay? Yes. It still pays, but it’s a gamble. And typical payouts appear to be tiny.

You might spend hours writing an article for a revshare site, but get little in return. Based on what we found researching this niche, you’ll likely be better off focusing your efforts on finding your own clients and charging guaranteed flat rates for your writing.

What’s your experience with revenue sharing sites? Let’s discuss in the comments.

Kimberly Sloan Jarrett is a freelance writer and broadcaster in Northwest Georgia.

Escape the Content Mills: Earn more as a writer. LEARN MORE


  1. John Soares

    The outlook for revenue sharing is definitely dismal.

    Another factor to consider: more and more people use ad-blocking software, including me. I hardly ever see ads on the Internet, and if I can’t see them, I can’t click on them.

    • Kim Jarrett

      That’s a great point. I am sure it has affected the industry.

    • Carol Tice

      Exactly — the final nail in the revshare coffin there.

  2. Elvis Michael

    Ah, this is a great article, Kim. Good to virtually see you again 🙂

    Revenue sharing is definitely not what it used to be, partly because of ad-blocking extensions as John Soares pointed out.

    Any website that relies on this alone is likely to fail sooner or later. For this reason, the rev-share model is only a tiny fraction of my website’s overall features. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket, right?

    Thanks for the mention and the great piece, Kim!


    • Carol Tice

      Fascinating, Elvis — why don’t you tell us about the other ways your site earns, and how writers profit from those?

    • Kim Jarrett

      Thank you Elvis.

  3. Evan Jensen

    I gave revenue sharing writing a try years ago. Wrote an article about trends in green living for Associated Content. It got like 5,000 views over a couple of months. And then I got paid $3.00.

    I like the “idea” of revenue share writing as a way to create passive income. But my one-article experiment convinced me it was a waste of my time and talent.

    I could have pitched a similar green living article to any number of magazines or blogs and earned a lot more.

    • Kim Jarrett

      I heard a lot of similar stories when researching this article. I wanted to hear from someone who was making real money writing from these sites.

      • Kim Jarrett

        To add to my above comment, I never did hear from any writers making more than a few dollars.

  4. Janine

    I’ve had experience with a site like this and it definitely paid in pennies. For newbies though with no samples do you think it’s worth it to write a few pieces for a portfolio or are energies better directed elsewhere?

    • Kim Jarrett

      Personally, I don’t think it’s worth your time but it’s been a long time since I have been a newbie. I would rather spend my time looking for better paying clients than writing for pennies.

    • Carol Tice

      I definitely don’t, Janine — the problem is the reputation of these sites is so poor, it doesn’t really make a great clip. Better to do a pro bono project for a local business or publication, where you can show there was an editor and you pleased a client, and you can get a testimonial.

  5. Andre'

    There is a new company called I joined 3 months ago, posted 54 articles and was paid $11-00 total into my PayPal account. Hope you can use this information. Regards, Andre’ Hartslief

    • Kim Jarrett

      I just checked it out. One reviewer said they just started paying bloggers in August?

      I couldn’t tell if you meant $11 or $1,100.

      Thanks for sharing!

      • Andre'

        Hello Kim! That was eleven dollars, total.
        Regards, Andre’

        • Lisa Cunningham

          That’s awful. Those people should be ashamed of themselves. Working for either the mills or revenue share sites kills your self esteem. That’s the biggest issue. It’s especially humiliating if you’ve been writing for 30 years like I have.

          • Carol Tice

            Agree — in my experience that is the single BIGGEST problem with writing for peanuts. It’s emotionally demoralizing! AND you become normalized to the idea that these tiny rates are what the marketplace offers…when in fact you’re only living in the UNDERWORLD of rates.

  6. Katherine Swarts

    Is there any real difference between revenue-share sites and content mills?

    • Kim Jarrett

      With revenue share, your pay is based on the number of clicks on the article or ad near the article. Content mills are just low paying markets.

      • Carol Tice

        Agree — most content mills I’ve seen pay a too-low flat fee. That’s the difference between mills and revenue share sites, where often, you don’t even get a small flat fee, just whatever pennies you earn from clicks.

    • Evan Jensen

      Hi Katherine,

      IMO – I think writing for revshare is actually worse than writing for content mills.

      As sucky as content mills are, just about anyone with basic writing skills and command of the English language can land $5 to $25 per-article assignments on any number of platforms. And those horribly low rates are still better than revshare payouts.

      On the bright side, I think just about anyone with decent writing skills who does consistent outbound marketing can land their own clients and make a lot more money than any revshare agreement or content mill gig.

      • Kim Jarrett

        I agree, Evan. I regret the time I wasted with content mills.

  7. Alexandria Gunn

    Well researched article, Kim. Thanks for all this.

    I still have content up on some residual income sites but don’t put fresh content on them. I do very little and still get about $50pm across the board for them. For the work I put into them years ago I’m happy to make money residual Lynn like that.

    Blasting News is slightly wrong. The 500 views are only US views. There’s a really poor rate for views from non English speaking countries, which is affecting a lot of writers. That site is definitely not worth it in my opinion.

    • Kim Jarrett

      Thank you. I reached out to several writers about their pay but didn’t receive a response. It’s interesting to hear what people are making.

    • Carol Tice

      Thanks for weighing in with your experience on that platform, Alexandria!

  8. Christina

    Thank you for this well-researched post! I actually didn’t know what this was. I thought it meant sharing revenue with other writers. As a newbie, I appreciate being informed on what to look out for and how industry changes are making some business models obsolete.Good to know! I also took away the constant message that we need to market! And not waste our time in the sea of low-paying gigs.

  9. raju

    First of all,

    speaking about opportunity, it was really good if they pay genuinely even if they pay based on views.

    At same time, the basic pay in revenue sharing sites or traffic based sites should be at least a good enough

    But most of the times, we do get time waste as we can’t make views for every article written and in the end a big waste of time. But as long as the views working fine and site pays, rev share also good ones.

    Unfortunately, there are no standard big news websites which pay based on views and allow any kind of content to pay the authors on traffic generated.

    Those who running rev share are playing it extremely safe by favoring everything towards them because they need not pay the penny if the article did not reach minimum views and the payout. Even the worse thing is the rule of 30 days payment has become a fashion which ultimately luring the writers work despite they pay only on views. This is really sad.

  10. Lisa Cunningham

    This doesn’t surprise me. I always thought it was too much of a risk. Thank you for confirming that!


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Related Posts

LinkedIn Round-Up

LinkedIn Round-Up

Successful freelancers use LinkedIn daily. After all, it's the only social media where it's socially acceptable to talk about work. In honor of our upcoming bootcamp, LinkedIn Profile Mastery, we wanted to give you a round-up of all our posts on the topic of LinkedIn....

9 Journalist Interview Tips from a Successful Freelance Writer

9 Journalist Interview Tips from a Successful Freelance Writer

Have you been struggling to interview sources for your freelance articles? Then these 9 interview tips are for you. These journalist interview tips will help boost your interviewing confidence and make you better prepared to take your freelance article to the next...