Writing for Guardian Liberty Voice: 10 Writers’ Stories

Carol Tice

Revenue share writing promises pay that often doesn't materialize.

I started this blog to help writers find freelance markets that pay well…and to warn writers away from sites that don’t.

All of which has led me to spend some time looking into startup news and op-ed website Guardian Liberty Voice, a 2-year-old, Las Vegas-based online news site started by entrepreneur and former chain restaurant manager DiMarkco Chandler.

What I learned led me to talk to writers with experience at GLV, to find out more. Before I launch into the writers’ stories, a little background on what GLV is and how I learned of them:

First contact

Earlier this year, a GLV manager emailed me, asking me to write for them and recruit a team of writers to work under me. They are seeking to hire 900 more writers in their quest to “raise the bar on citizen journalism.”

At that point, I’d never heard of them.

They explained that they paid per-ad-impression…in other words, for eyeballs on ads. I responded that I didn’t work for clients without at least some guaranteed pay. But I wondered if they might be a pay opportunity for political writers, a niche with few paying markets.

So I started asking around to find people who’d been writing for Guardian Liberty Voice. I also asked GLV if they could provide a referral to a happy current GLV writer who wasn’t part of GLV’s editorial or management staff, and spoke to one. In all, I spoke to more than ten writers.

To respond to some of the issues the writers raised, GLV senior managing editor Rebecca Savastio served as GLV’s spokeswoman, and Chandler also spoke with me on Skype.

GLV 101

First off, some basics on how GLV works, and what’s been said about the company publicly:

  • As GLV describes on its own About page, the company began as the Las Vegas Guardian, but had to change its name after the highly regarded Guardian newspaper of London objected, evolving to Guardian Liberty Voice. After a brief time as a print publication, GLV switched to digital-only.
  • Writers who apply to GLV are put through a two-week training bootcamp, during which they typically write upwards of 20 posts. On the final day alone, writers are required to write six articles.
  • GLV reports that 80 percent of writers fail to graduate from bootcamp, which means they earn nothing for posts written during bootcamp.
  • Writers must continue to write for GLV for at least 50 days and see royalties top $50 to receive a paycheck.
  • From there, every month that writers have at least two posts published, they remain current with GLV and can continue to receive pay, based on how many views their articles have had. Royalty percentages increase if you post more. Cease writing for them, and all royalties end, even on previously posted work.
  • At least one formal complaint has been filed against GLV with the Las Vegas attorney general’s office by a former GLV writer and editor. In the April 14 filing, Idaho-based Heather Pilkinton reports she ended up working long hours for what penciled out to 47 cents an hour.

The short version

Despite its claims of groundbreaking pay models and carving a new path for citizen journalism, GLV appears to be simply a low-paying revenue-share platform where most of the articles are quick rewrites of items found through Google News.

Writers — many of them brand-new freelancers — often end up earning nothing. Payout documents supplied to this blog provide a single-month snapshot: of 50 writers who were with GLV in June 2013, only two made more than $500 in one month. For the rest, average pay was just $45 a month.

Company founder Chandler is widely described as a charismatic man who draws people to his projects, but promises things he doesn’t always deliver. Among those who feel lied to by Chandler are his former employers at the Las Vegas Tribune. There is much more to the story of Chandler than I have included here — I’ve restricted my focus to what I think might directly affect freelance writers.

For more details, read on to hear from GLV’s writers in their own words.

Earning more with his own blog

Brand-new Toronto freelancer Jonathan Holowka initially spotted a Craigslist ad for GLV. He raved about his GLV bootcamp experience in a post on his blog. Within weeks of posting it, though, he had quit.

In a Skype call, Holowka explained why his viewpoint on GLV quickly changed:

“On the first day of bootcamp, they did show us how much people were earning, and I remember the numbers being quite small. But I saw those numbers and thought, ‘I’m sure I can do better than that.’ I got in my mind that I could surpass that, somehow. And they really seemed to like my writing.”

As a writer with absolutely no previous online writing experience, Holowka says he found the bootcamp “really good, and free…we learned how to write organically and not word-stuff.” He passed bootcamp and was certified.

His pay for 65 articles written over two months? It was $85, or about $1.30 per post.

Holowka’s conclusion was that he could do better putting up his own website — and he has. His site, What To Do When Bored, has made $450 off the first 50 articles he posted on it in just its first weeks, Holowka reports.

Some quit during bootcamp

One of the reasons 80 percent of GLV writers wash out may be because many realize little income is likely, and quit before the bootcamp ends. That’s what Reno-based writer Hamilton Tolson did back in February, after writing just three articles. Here’s a digest of GLV impressions he emailed me:

“I’ll be honest — knowing nothing about finding a job as a writer, other than that I had a marked interest in politics, I was stoked with what I thought was a real job opportunity. [GLV] had me write three articles.

“Then he clued me in to the whole ‘team building’ bullshit by telling me that I too could, perhaps, have a team under me in the future.

“As soon as I attended the first class of bootcamp, I quit.  The first class was a round robin of glad-handing, as DiMarkco and others praised each other back and forth, while we all listened.  I realized I was in a virtual classroom with many others who barely spoke, or typed, English.

“I only wish I had done the diligence to research the company a bit. These people prey on the desperation of young, uninformed writers. I’m ashamed to have been stupid enough not to know better.”

GLV’s Savastio says writers who make it through their initial 50 days are paid a flat $30 for their first three “tryout” posts, and that Tolson went unpaid because he didn’t stay long enough.

Creating fake social-media identities

In contrast to Holowka’s reaction, Denver-based freelance writer Danyelle Overbo told me she found the bootcamp a mind-numbing waste of time. She waited an hour or more while Chandler logged writers in, went over SEO basics, and repeatedly showed writers the GLV categories they needed to use for posting.

“It was really nonsensical,” she says. “He would say things that were wrong about grammar.”

Perhaps the single biggest issue that made Overbo quit was the black-hat social-media techniques she saw demonstrated. In some post-bootcamp meetings, Savastio has shared how she creates multiple fake Facebook identities so she can pose as a fan and promote her posts more aggressively, which she describes as key to helping posts “go viral.”

Savastio says she’s aware this violates Facebook’s terms of service, but says she considers the move “guerrilla marketing” and has no ethical qualms about using this promotional technique.

When she estimated what she’d be earning, Overbo says it appeared to be roughly a penny an article.

“I was trying to launch a freelance writing business,” she says, “and it was just a huge waste of time.”

Earnings: zero

L.A. based new freelance writer Luke Sargent is among the 80 percent of GLV writers who quit by the end of bootcamp. Sargent says he wised up when one editor accidentally opened a payout spreadsheet and he saw the small amounts writers were owed.

“They got 30 articles from me, all free,” he says. “They sell it as, ‘You’re building your business,’ but of course you’re not — you’re building their business.”

He also saw that the premise of earning on an ongoing basis from the news articles was unlikely to pan out.

“That can never happen, because it’s a news site,” he says, “and people aren’t interested in old news.”

GLV’s Chandler says he’s straight with writers from the start — that it could take six months to start earning anything, and that for some, it might turn out to be more of a hobby than a revenue generator.

Who’s his ideal writer? “We’re looking for housewives, and people who don’t have anything to do,” he says. “They love writing and use it to supplement their income.”

Payment delays

If they can get a check, that is. That proved a struggle for Iftikhar Tariq Khanzada, a Pakistani attorney who does freelance writing in his spare time to bring in extra money. He started with GLV in September and wrote 229 articles in all — over 100,000 published words, he relates.

He says his dashboard shows he’s owed $126 for that effort, having hit the $50 minimum last October. But despite repeated requests over a period of several months, a payment was never sent until March — and that was for $108, not $126.

Khanzada feels his distant locale made GLV managers feel paying him was optional. “What could I do to them, from here?” he told me in a Skype call.

This particularly rankled because in meetings, when writers complained, Chandler would tell them to look at their long-term earning potential with fast-rising GLV. He’d direct them to business-valuation site WorthofWeb, which at one point indicated GLV was worth more than $25 million, and talk about how they could end up earning big if they stuck with GLV.

“[Chandler] boasts that he’s buying a Mercedes, and his company has a $25 million valuation, but he can’t pay me $100?” Khanzada asks. “That’s paradoxical. Writers shouldn’t be writing for this scam.”

Overworked editors

To help grow its writing staff, GLV editors encourage writers to recruit a team and become editors. GLV’s Savastio says it is not a multi-level marketing model — writers only earn from the team they directly recruit. There is no “downline.”

Editors are paid a stipend ranging from $100-$800 per month. Though this brings some guaranteed income, the hourly rate for editors may work out even worse than it does for writers.

In the complaint she filed with the Las Vegas attorney general, former GLV editor Heather Pilkinton says that while some editors and key writers were repeatedly promised they’d be given 1 percent equity stakes in GLV worth $250,000, nothing materialized except a stipend raise for Pilkinton to $500 a month. Writer Overbo says she also heard the $250K spiel, but Savastio says she’s never heard that promise.

A few quotes from Pilkinton’s complaint:

“…The saturation of writers is so high in order for writers to actually earn money by writing for the GLV, they must write an exorbitant number of articles. This also means that there are so many articles going up that many articles get lost with only a minimum amount of reads. Because of the 50-day payout and because of the $50 minimum required to receive payout, many writers leave without ever seeing any of the money their articles have earned, meaning [GLV] has accumulated a bunch of free content.

“Editors often find themselves working 7 days a week, upwards of 15 hours a day. [Once, Chandler] decided he needed to call me at 1 a.m.  Very rarely does the total payout for the editors reach $1,000 for an entire month, and that includes the stipend and the commissions. Plus, in order for commissions to be paid out, editors, on top of their other duties, are expected to [write] anywhere between 29 and 112 articles per month.

She also points out that writers see pay only from one of the ad networks that serve ads onto GLV’s pages — Tribal Fusion — while GLV works with several ad networks. Savastio confirms that writers only get paid from Tribal Fusion, adding that revenue from the other ad networks is minimal in comparison, and goes toward the editor stipend payments.

The biggest month she had during her five month stay, Pilkinton made $685, working more than full-time hours. She estimates that given the time she put in, it came out to 47 cents an hour.

For her part, Savastio says she earns little from her editing chores, but enjoys mentoring writers. “Not everything is about money for me,” she says.

A self-described “mediocre” writer who says she doesn’t have the chops to write for higher-paying magazine markets, Savastio adds that she considers the chance to earn a living as a writer a dream come true, despite the 12-hour days.

Her total pay last month, thanks mostly to a couple of posts that got lots of views, was roughly $2,000, or $7.75 per hour. She says that in the world of revshare, GLV’s stipends are rare — when she was looking for a new gig after leaving AOL’s imploding Patch network, she says AllVoices didn’t offer stipends, for instance.

Cloudy visibility

While some writers report they were able to keep tabs on how much they were earning, others felt the information was hard to come by.

For instance, Costa Rica-based writer Mimi Mudd did the bootcamp in February, and wrote over 50 articles over the course of two months. She says requests to see what her income would be were met with weeks of stonewalling. Finally, one editor showed her she’d accumulated just $4.50, not enough to receive a check under GLV’s payout rules. Mudd departed in April.

“If you’re looking for exposure as a writer,” Mudd says, “if you’re looking to get articles published and get clips, there are far better ways to do it.”

Savastio says since Mudd’s departure, she has strengthened the training on how to view earnings and stresses that if posts don’t get huge traffic, writers will not earn enough to see a paycheck.

Article spinning

Then there’s the quality of work GLV writers do. While a small portion of the posts involve unique interviews, writers say the vast majority are simply quickly rewritten from items found searching Google News. Former GLV writer Juana Poareo, reports she earned $800 for 173 articles — or about $4.62 per piece — over the course of four months. The L.A.-based writer says posts are cranked out fast, and that she routinely ran her own articles through Copyscape, to make sure they’d been rewritten enough that they wouldn’t be considered duplicate copy.

Why are writers article spinning? Time pressure to meet their posting goals and keep earning, Poareo says, as well as to quickly recycle the hottest topics currently trending online, in hopes of catching some of the big traffic needed to get paid.

“Writers are pressured to perform and get their articles to go viral,” Poareo, who is deaf, said in a Skype chat interview.

Reading the site myself, I found most stories simply recycle trending news or research press releases, as with this story about 3D-printed cancer cures. Adding insult to injury, GLV’s style is to put the links to the original sources at the bottom of stories, rather than appearing with relevant key words in the parts of the post that derive from each source, thereby minimizing their prominence and the likelihood they’ll be clicked — and also leaving readers to guess which facts came from where.

Vague, unsupported sentences are typical, such as this one from the 3D printing story: “Doctors will agree that current cancer therapies are horribly imprecise.”

Good grammar also appears to be optional, as with the opening sentence of this energy story, reproduced exactly as it appears:

Natural gas vs. oil, which is more affordable -when considering efficiency- to heat a home?

Chandler says GLV now has over 300 writers. Won’t the pay pool be diluted as ever more stories and writers vie for the same eyeballs? Chandler’s plan is to reassign many of the writers to some of the nearly dozen other sites he’s created, to keep things stable at GLV.

The (sort of) happy camper

You may be wondering — who enjoys writing for GLV? In general, new freelance writers who are unaware of any other way to make more money from writing.

One of these is Douglas Cobb, a former teacher and current Arkansas resident with multiple advanced degrees. Cobb has been writing for GLV for over a year, usually writing 40 or more posts a month in his off hours from his regular job at an auto-parts store. He estimates he spends 15 or more hours a week writing his posts.

He’s been given the title senior review editor, though no extra pay comes with this. With an emphasis on writing TV and entertainment-related stories that sometimes include interviews, Cobb has done fairly well by GLV standards.

His pay has ranged from about $250 a month — around $4 an hour — to over $1,000. When I explained what I’ve earned as a blogger, he was interested to learn how to find better markets.

“I knew getting into it that it’s not a way to make a whole lot of money,” he says of GLV. “But it is a way to make some. If I knew of any other places, I’d try them out.”

What will Google do?

The final question about GLV is how Google will respond to the site’s mass of recycled content. Savastio said she’s well aware that a tweak in the wrong direction by Google’s algorithms, and much of GLV’s traffic could vanish overnight. Alexa reports that roughly one-third of the site’s traffic comes through the search engine.

GLV’s Chandler says the worst has already happened.

He reports that earlier this month, he discovered Google had removed all GLV’s stories from its News results. Chandler worked frantically to remove ads from the site and create a cleaner layout, which he says helped GLV return to News results. He admits he may need to remove more ads — and that this reduced ability to advertise may hit writers’ paychecks.

GLV has gotten tougher about who it lets graduate from bootcamp, Savastio says, trying to screen out lower-quality writers to help keep Google happy. Which means that now, likely even more than 80 percent of the bootcamp writers will wash out.

“This pay model is definitely not for everyone,” Savastio says. “It’s performance-based pay. Then again, no one is making anyone work here.”

The past is prologue

Prior to starting GLV, founder Chandler was employed at the Las Vegas Tribune, for about six months that ended with his firing (or quitting, depending on who you believe) in February 2012. The paper’s founder, editor-in-chief and publisher Rolando Larraz, recalls Chandler was so broke when he arrived, he didn’t own a car and was staying in a weekly-rate hotel, for which Larraz footed the bill. Larraz took him under his wing, and soon Chandler had password access to company computers and bank accounts — which Larraz quickly came to regret.

“He wanted to be the publisher, and I didn’t want him to be,” Larraz told me in a recent phone conversation.

In an op-ed piece in the paper in the wake of Chandler’s departure, Chandler’s hire was termed a “fiasco” by managing editor Maramis Choufani. Larraz actually ran a front page article headlined, “DiMarkco Chandler Is Not Affiliated With the Las Vegas Tribune In Any Way,” on Feb. 29, 2012. In it, Larraz warns his paper’s readers and advertisers that he’d discovered Chandler was soliciting ad checks from Tribune advertisers after he’d left the paper, while claiming to still be with the Tribune.

Chandler remembers it differently. In his version, Larraz’s paper was failing financially, Chandler was working to save and relaunch it in a more viable form, and Chandler ended up out of pocket for a new Spanish/English version of the paper the two were partnering on, for which Chandler printed multiple editions.

“I worked without him paying me a dime,” he says.

Interestingly, the Tribune‘s policy of paying writers nothing is what inspired Chandler to create his pay model at GLV. He’s proud to be offering writers at least the chance to earn something, compared with what he saw at the Tribune.

“My writers are making more money than me,” Chandler says, “and they get to write whatever they want.”

In her op-ed piece after his firing, Choufani writes that Chandler had “ill intent, betrayed us, and took what wasn’t his,” leaving “a trail of deceit and lies.” She calls him “a really great con artist.”

“If DiMarkco is still out there fooling others,” Choufani writes, “I feel sorry for them.”

What’s your reaction? Leave a comment and tell us what you think.

Related: Content Mills – Did I Pick the Wrong One?



  1. Leslie Jordan Clary

    Great expose! This must have been gratifying, and maybe even fun, to write. More than 10 years ago during my first stint freelancing, I got caught up in one of these called Internet Illuminations. The guy sounds so similar! Charismatic. Enthusiastic. I ended up writing about six entire websites. Never saw a penny. The best thing that came out of it is it made me wary.

    • Carol Tice

      Exhausting is the word that springs to mind…but I considered it public service to the writer community, as it’s a new platform and little is known about it.

  2. Jonathan Holowka

    Jonathan Holowka here from the interview. Thanks Carol for taking the time to interview me and publish this post. I had no idea about Heather, interesting because she was essentially the second-in-command during my time writing there.

    Yes, when I started at GLV I was quite optimistic and enthusiastic that I could do quite well. But it seemed that the only way to make a real income was to recruit a team or writers to work under you at which point you were essentially a multi-level marketer and no longer a writer. Since then I’ve started my new website, What to Do When Bored and have been taking Jon Morrow’s guest blogging course as recommended by Carol.

    I do enjoy writing and think there are valuable ways to write and get results, but the best way to write for yourself and get paid is to start your own venture (such as I did) or seek out well paying opportunities. For anyone interested in keeping in touch with me, I’m working on putting some type of course together on my website (not the What to Do When Bored one) on how to market yourself online. I’ve definitely had some real success with my newer website and am looking forward to seeing how these grow.

    It’s nice to have full ownership over your content 😀

    • Carol Tice

      Yes, Jonathan, when I looked back at the original comment thread that piqued my interest in GLV, it’s funny to see that almost all of the commenters who wrote in support of GLV just a few months back are now naysayers.

      And agree with you — if you’re going to blog a lot, either get paid well by clients, or write your own site. Or both..which is what I’ve done. 😉

      • Jonathan Holowka

        Yep! I fully agree with you there. I just need to figure out some ways to monetize. Hopefully Jon Morrow’s course will help inspire me somehow.

        Back when that other post of yours was having all that discussion… I was so young and innocent back then… Now I’m just young.

        Also… I incorrectly replied to you in the wrong spot up above. If you could delete that reply that would be great >_<.

    • Juana

      Hi Jonathan,

      Like you, I was enthusiastic about writing for a digital pub. I did cotton on that GLV wasn’t a good place to write for because it smelled scammy but I was getting back into writing again and loved just being able to write. What made me stay longer was the people I was working with (NOT D or Becky but Heather and others).

  3. Ray Burow

    Thank you for this informative email. I was contacted by Guardian. Feeling that it was too good to be true, and the fact that it sounded very content mill like, I passed. However, I wasn’t completely sure if I made the right decision.
    I am now.

  4. Kinya Shelley

    Excellent article Carol. I have seen these Guardian posts all over the place. The setup sounds like a scam. The language of those in charge give it away. “No one is forcing you to work here.” “This pay model is not for everyone.” Using undrthanded tactics to get views and make your posts go viral…I’m shaking my head. Looks like the 80% who don’t graduate are better off.

    • Carol Tice

      Well…except for the part where they write 20 blog posts for free.

  5. Angie Mansfield

    I’m always sad when I hear writers get taken in by these sites that pay so very little. With even the bare minimum of marketing, they could be making so much more — without having to kill themselves trying to work 24/7.

    And if you’re a “housewife, or people with nothing better to do,” you’re better off starting your own blog. At least your content will be YOURS.

    • peachfront

      Housewives or other people with nothing to do — assuming these people with nothing to do even exist — should write on WattPad or some other place where they can write stories they actually enjoy without any concern for commercial results. If someone is not in it for the money, yet has a lower disposable income to spend on their hobby, they can still blog on WattPad, Tumblr, or even publish a Kindle Amazon short without spending anything but their time. They sure don’t need to sign on to write somebody else’s stories for 47 cents an hour. And many of these “writers” are not writing for 47 cents an hour. They are stealing for 47 cents an hour.

      I agree that not everyone needs to write for profit. However, if you are writing for pleasure, then it should be pleasure. Writing a fanfic is a better use of your time than “spinning,” which is just another word for good old fashioned plagiarism under any university’s honor code.

      Starting one’s own blog will probably end up costing a few hundred dollars a year, and 9 out of 10 writers won’t earn more than that. So I get why some low income writers don’t start their own blog. But if it’s a hobby, write for 12 hours a week and do it well and enjoy it. Don’t rip-off other writers for12 hours a day and then wonder why karma comes back to bite you in the rear.

      • Jonathan Holowka

        Not sure how starting your own blog would cost you a few hundred dollars a year. Use blogger if you don’t want to worry about hosting costs. I’ve spent a grand total of $30 on What to Do When Bored ($10 for domain and $20 for some Facebook ads) and have made about $600 off of Adsense so far.

        • Laurie Swenson

          Jonathan, can you explain how you make money from Adsense on “What to Do When Bored?” I’m vaguely aware of Adsense, but I’m curious about the nuts and bolts for you, a specific person using it. Thanks! The site is fun, btw.

          • Jonathan Holowka

            Thanks Laurie! I’m glad you’ve enjoyed my site. Adsense works pretty straight forward. You make a certain amount of money from every one thousand views you get as long as their are Google ads on your site; this is your CPM. I receive anywhere from 5,000 – 35,000 page views a day right now so my earnings are based off that of that. I make around $5 on a low day to almost $40 on a good one. It’s certainly not a full-time income but it’s a nice side income right now, until I figure out better ways to monetize and build the site better.

            Does that answer your question? I’m wondering if I can write a post about using Adsense in some way.

      • Angie Mansfield

        I agree with Jonathan – there’s no reason you’d have to spend hundreds per year on a blog. Even my self-hosted WordPress sites only cost me around $100 for both the hosting and the domain registration.

        We agree, however, that nobody — even if you’re just looking for a few extra spending dollars — should have to spin other people’s content for 47 cents an hour.

  6. Allen Taylor

    I read the GLV ad looking for writers. As soon as I discovered it was revenue share I lost interest. I’ve never seen a good revenue share “opportunity.” I’ve written for both HubPages and the Yahoo! Contributor Network and you have to write a lot of articles and promote them heavily to make any money. If you wanted to write for a revenue-share website, I would say go with HubPages or Yahoo! Both are at least established companies with some level of legitimacy. Startups are a wash.

    Great article, Carol.

      • Allen Taylor

        That makes sense, Carol. Someone should make a list of reputable revenue share sites for writers. Point out the ones the stay away from and the ones to lean toward. 😉

        • Carol Tice

          There is no list of “good” revshare sites, Allen. My point of view is that all sites that pay only on revshare should be avoided by freelance writers. It’s just too speculative.

          I do believe that pay-for-performance is making its way into the business models of legit sites, as we’ve seen with Forbes. But there should always be base pay where you can count on at least some income, is my view.

          • Allen Taylor

            I agree. I won’t do it again unless my base pay is equal to what I’d expect to receive for any other writing.

    • Chet

      I’ve had the same experience with HubPages and Squidoo. That writing did help me hash out some ideas, that may or may not prove useful, but you have to do a huge amount of work and marketing to generate any income at all. Better to have your own blog and Web site and sell from there I think.

  7. Karen Walcott

    All of the stories in this article are extremely accurate. I worked for the GLV briefly. I wrote about 30 articles in 2 weeks because I was promised a stipend if I completed bootcamp. Then when I completed bootcamp I was told that stipends were only for editors. It’s bullshit. Chandler is a con artist. He is very convincing and I completely bought into his spiel.

  8. Kathleen

    I’m sorry this happened to these writers. I hope they won’t get fooled again.

    To Johnnie Cochran-ize a valuable lesson: “If they don’t pay, just walk away.”

  9. art williams

    Very obviously a scam albeit one where, just like Obama, the perpetrator is delusional. I write about the Multilevel Marketing industry in my position right now and we’ve just been through several weeks of being bothered by news about a huge MLM ponzi scheme called TelexFREE. They scammed people out of many millions of dollars. The owner made it out of the country and is back in Brazil but everybody else got nailed here in the US…. including his wife.

    This guy, DiMarko, is doing the same thing that some MLM scammers do…i.e. taking advantage of people’s desperation and frankly I don’t know if anybody can protect those kind of people from their own ‘bad genes’. Some will eventually figure it out and some won’t.

    Long term, I think the lack of quality in DiMarko’s product and/or his own greed and lack of long-term good business sense will be his undoing.


    • Carol Tice

      They are trying to encourage better quality posts…but the problem is there’s little incentive to spend more time on posts at this pay rate.

  10. Juana

    I think you did a good job with this, Carol! I appreciate all the hard work I know you put into this, all for the benefit of freelance writers everywhere.

    I have to admit I was surprised to hear Savastio call herself a “mediocre” writer. I’m not sure how to react to that, but I think this admission would probably explain why she writes for publications that pay shit.

    Also, I don’t know whether the omission was intentional but I also worked as a junior editor the last two or three months, which entailed working one full-time evening shift per week. I was frustrated by the poor writing quality and often found myself trying to clean up copy any chance I could. It was embarrassing being associated with awful writers, because I do not consider myself a mediocre writer at all.

    Even while saying this, I don’t regret writing for GLV, because I met some awesome people like Heather and others, and because it showed me how much I should value my writing.

    • Carol Tice

      Thanks for weighing in, Juana — I don’t think you mentioned that you ended up in an editorial role to me, is the only reason why it’s not included…or it’s my oversight.

      • Juana

        No problem, Carol 😉 I hope with this coming out, GLV will be shut down. But there is the small matter of DiMarkco creating offshoots of GLV.

  11. Kimberly Jones

    So, you only get paid on previous work…work for which you received no royalties…so long as you still continue to write for them? This sounds like slavery to me. No thank you. I feel terrible for those with so little business experience that they don’t see through this. You really are doing an important service for freelance writers, Carol. Nobody should be allowed to exploit the hard work and talent of another. It’s just sad.

  12. Heather Pilkinton

    While I wasn’t quite expecting to see my name, I will say what ultimately drove me to leave. The constant demands on my time, including the 1 am phone call (among others) and the email accusing me of not taking the publication seriously were only two of the reasons. The main one, however, was that GLV was putting a serious strain on my marriage and my family. My husband was getting angrier and angrier, and I found myself constantly defending GLV, DiMarkco and the promises to him to the point where he was threatening to get on the phone to DiMarkco and find out when all these promises were actually going to take place. The ultimate end came when he came home to find me enraged because I had been ripped into in front of an entire group of people. He told me no job was worth the damage this one was doing not only to our marriage and family, but to my self respect. I will also say it is a good thing we don’t live in Vegas.

    I was the one telling people that this was their own business, they had to work for it…but the more I said it, the less I believed it. I had others tell me they knew the promises were empty, but they could write what they wanted, so they stayed.

    I applied for freelance positions after I quit, but I have not been able to write. I have no desire to. I can’t even bring myself to sit in my office at this point…nearly two months later.

    I will say my husband and kids are definitely glad to have me back.

    • Carol Tice

      Sorry to hear about the impact working for GLV had on your family life, Heather. I hope after a break you can get back to writing for better clients! They are out there.

    • Jonathan Holowka

      Hi Heather, I hope you remember me! I left shortly before you did and have had no regrets. I am really happy to hear that you have regained control of your life. I always thought you were awesome and had your heart in the right place. Good to see that you are doing better for yourself now!

    • Beth Balen

      Heather I agree. I ended up teaching boot camp after you left and it was so obvious that these trainees were being taken for a ride that I couldn’t make myself give them the pitch any more. It’s horrible how he takes advantage of poorly paid people who are working their butts off. A $200 monthly stipend apparently means 24/7 availability!

      • Carol Tice

        His POV to me was that — he pays something. There are plenty of sites like HuffPo that don’t even pretend they’ll pay you a dime. So in his view, he’s doing something good. And in that sense, in a weird way, he’s got a point.

        The fact that people are generating thousands of pieces of content and getting paid $40 for it…well, let’s say the writers I’ve talked to don’t agree with his assessment that paying a pittance for this much work is a good thing.

        I’ve always said it’s better to write for free than for a tiny paycheck, because then you never get confused that this could grow up to be a living. You know you have to move on and find better clients.

    • Faryal

      Hey Heather! I am one year late in posting on this comment .. You trained me and just 2 days before my “graduation” i had heard that you had quit… I did graduate and while this had been happening, i was working for GLV and never thought to Google and find out more about it.

      I quit 4 months later .. Not only because i was not making enough money, but the main reason had been similar to yours. I had been “promoted” to being the head of the business department and GLV just sucked the life out of me. And i was just made empty promises too. I never got compensated for all the time i spent writing, editing, attending all the endless meetings and what not ..

      In fact, i even got wrongly accused of trying to flirt with my head via emails (the idea even one year forward makes my blood boil!) which led me to realise that my emails were being monitored, which in itself was shocking.

      After working too much and not being paid a single penny.. Not to forget the false accusation.. I called it quits ..

      I am so much more happier now n i just recently had a baby .. 🙂

      I never got a chance to say it then, but u were a wonderful person. Im glad to read things are good for u. Stay blessed:)

  13. Silvia

    Isn’t it a pure scam? I too fell into the believe something would happen. DiMarkco is a pure liar. He makes more than all 300 of his writers combined. His wife flaunted her massive diamond ring, and $60,000 car all over Facebook, including their brand new home, which can fit 5 apartments. This is a content mill and I highly suggest everyone to stay away!

  14. Chet

    I am a new-ish GLV writer. This article kind of reinforces my concern that I got drawn into something that will not pay off. My contract is to deliver 16 articles a month, which isn’t too much of a burden. On the downside, I haven’t earned enough yet to get any payout. In boot camp I wrote a total of…pauses to do some math…27 articles over two weeks. While writers in boot camp are paid, in theory, I don’t think I earned much. Of the 27 articles, only 1 or 2 got much traffic. While I would like to keep up the science writing, I am not going to do any serious research and interviewing unless I have a legitimate shot at making at least a few cents per word from a sale.

    • Carol Tice

      Sixteen articles “not too much of a burden?” That is a TON of work, all on spec that maybe you’ll make a dime. Put that energy toward proactively marketing to find legitimate clients, and your whole income picture could be radically different.

    • Silvia

      Chet, you can use Blogger, or even develop a WordPress site through a great host like Webhost.pro, Bluehost, etc. for a little bit of money and develop an excellent brand. You can become a powerhouse, guiding your own level of income with affiliates and sponsors. I was there for quite some time, and the “mental” abuse of the owner is insane. The fact he told Carol it is was “housewives” and those who do nothing? Insulting, and utterly disgusting.

    • Angie Mansfield

      Science writing is a highly marketable skill. If you’ve got the experience, I’d suggest setting up your own website with a blog. You can market yourself to real clients that pay professional rates, and probably attract a few more with a well-written blog that builds a decent audience. And ALL of your work will be benefiting you in some way — instead of just being largely wasted effort.

  15. Julie Mahfood

    I also wrote and edited at GLV, which apparently has just changed its name again to include the word “university.” One can only presume this is to rewrite the business model to either justify the low pay or even cease pay altogether, under the premise writers are being taught. I did learn a few things while there. It is a fact I had never used Google Analytics before. I also became better acquainted with WordPress, as I am a middle-aged writer more accustomed to word processing than online publishing.

    I went in fairly certain I would make little, and okay with this as I was gaining experiences I didn’t have, mostly to do with online publishing and social media. Despite having accepted from the start I would make little, I left after two months, because a stream of good people began leaving. I took bootcamp under Heather and she included me in her brood when my team lead turned out not to be very communicative. Other editors too were very enthusiastic and supportive, though less clued in with reality perhaps than Heather in terms of what might be possible with GLV.

    When Heather left, and someone else I worked with who I tremendously respected, I asked about it at a team meeting. I asked for a venue to discuss the issue and was told there was nothing to talk about. I insisted on some discussion and was shut down at the meeting and then in an email later the same day. I felt zealous about Heather I suppose, because I admit to holding no punches in my reply (no swearing or anything that unprofessional, just the unvarnished truth). I then had an email from Rebecca DiSavastio who I had never, ever heard of, much less been introduced to. The self-professed mediocre writer lambasted me and every single other “newbie.” We had come in and had the gall to have opinions or make suggestions, when the battle- hardened like her were the only ones making any money. She attacked my writing, my character, and had the tenacity to further reference my page views as being less than desirable, again making this a general comment against the new recruits in general.

    I replied not half as unprofessionally, but again with the unvarnished truth. I was suspended for a week and I quickly quit.

    Last week I finally got paid $93 for almost 50 articles. When I told DiMarcko about the over 9 million views I have had for one piece on another site, he asked for a link, which I admit I gleefully provided. After seeing I was telling the truth, he requested that I Skype him. I did not, but the incredible cohones of the man to think I might either provide any kind of aid or my services again after how everyone had been treated…well, all I have to say about Rebecca DiSavastio’s ongoing loyalty to him is that someone should point out to her he’s already married. He clearly has groupies.

    • Carol Tice

      Julie, I’m starting to feel like I’m hosting a GLV reunion on here!

      The university side is their effort to market their bootcamp training more widely, from what Chandler told me. And it’s Savastio – don’t know if that’s some kind of Freudian slip there. 😉

      Sounds like you were able to find a better gig where you can get good traffic.

  16. Carol J. Alexander

    Wow! I just stumbled upon a GLV ad a few days ago and passed it by because of the “pay per click” compensation.
    The more I read of your expose, Carol, the more nauseated I became. I’m one of those housewives with nothing to do except…
    absolutely everything that keeps a home going with seven people living in it, homeschooling two of the kids, and attempting to raise most of our food.
    Plus, I run a freelance writing business part-time that actually earns our family money to put in the bank.
    Where can I go to let this guy know what housewives do all day? I’d love to inform him.

  17. Julia

    Hi Carol,

    I just read your article and wow! I’m blown away. It’s an incredible story but even more, it’s well written and researched. It really shows how much you know what you’re doing.

    Which brings me to my point–

    I want to highlight to all the people who want to start a freelance writing career how much Carol could help them in the Den. She knows how to write and she knows how to run a freelance writing career. She walks her talk.

    One of the complaints that new writers worry about is how they’ll get ideas for their stories. Here Carol took a series of comments from her blog and turned them into a huge expose. She knew how to research the company, find sources, do interviews and pull all of it together into a substantial article.

    If you have dreams of doing that, Carol shows you how in the Den.

    To be clear–I’m not making money off of this testimonial. In fact, I pay to be part of the Den. It’s just that I’ve watched Carol’s commitment to helping writers for years. Now I have a chance to point out proof of what I’ve seen. (Carol–are you blushing yet?)


    My advice to all you GLV writers who really dream of being a freelance writer. Get on Carol’s email list and find out how to join the Den.

    Thank you, Carol, for helping so many writers.

    • Carol Tice

      Now cut that out, Julia!

      But seriously, thanks for the endorsement. Helping Den members is a serious thrill for me. I didn’t think of this piece as a teaching moment, but I guess it is.

      Writers who want to stand out: You can do magazine-level work on your blog. Just commit.

  18. Sherri

    “We’re looking for housewives, and people who don’t have anything to do.” This is code word for- you’d better have some means of financial support behind you ’cause you won’t see any money here.
    I saw the Craigslist ad for this. It sounded scammy so I passed it up.
    Whatever happened to the US minimum wage law which, I understand, is approx. $7.25 an hour, and why doesn’t it apply here? Something needs to be done…

    • Carol Tice

      Unfortunately, it doesn’t apply to freelancers. It’s up to us to run our businesses so that we make a living wage.

  19. Samar

    All I can say is wow. Hats off to you for taking the time to write this expose Carol.

    It’s yet another example for new freelancers that pay per view or pay per click is never a good money making model – even on your own site.

    Knocking on virtual doors and telling people you’re a freelance writer who can write for them yields better results.

    I read a comment where the lady said she was under contract to write 16 articles for them. If I wrote 16 articles and offered them as guest posts – I’d be inundated with work queries!

    In fact, every GLV writer, please do that. Don’t waste you time on the boot camp. I bet they’re not teaching you anything you can’t learn yourself or on the job.

    • Carol Tice

      I know — imagine if you had 16 free guest posts on high-reputation, popular blogs. At this point I’m only regularly writing for one blog like that, and it’s brought me some amazing clients. Better than earning $45 for them.

  20. Cinthia

    Jeez, I work as a newspaper editor and I’m embarrassed to pay freelancers a mere $100-$150 per story. I can’t imagine having the balls to expect writers to work (slave!) for free.

    • Carol Tice

      Welcome to the world of revenue share, Cinthia…paying pennies since the early 2000s.

  21. Steve Johnson

    Good grief.This is not an article, this is a one sided rant from a competitor. The writer of the blog has a conflict of interest in that she is a direct competitor of GLV’s boot camp in that she has a paid writers boot camp. Her efforts to damn the GLV are clearly motivated by her charging people to join her “writers den” and this obviously impacts the objectivity of her piece and this fact is never disclosed in her article. Granted, this is just her personal blog not a news agency but still…..

    It is also sort of off putting that the people who were the sources of the article are clammering to chime in under the comments section. That does not scream of a balanced approach as does the omission of a comparison to other similar businesses. The GLV is taken under analysis with no context or frame of reference. You all come across like people with a personal axe to grind, not real writing professionals.

    I went through GLV underneath her and only posted an article or two but have no beef. Rebecca was my mentor and always supportive to me, I felt like she wanted me to succeed and I think going after a non owner publicly like this and posting her earnings is sophomoric and rude. The self professed “mediocre writer” quip is an interesting spin because if she were self congratulatory of her writing then you’d have spun that she was arrogant and pompous. Rebecca has had several multi million click articles, no one else I know of has had one. Not even close. When she was my mentor she had an article picked up by Huffington Post. Is it fair to denigrate her has a mediocre writer when in fact she has had success.I wonder how many million click articles those trashing her on this page have had or ever WILL have? How about the author of this article? Easy to throw stones….

    I was only there a brief time cause my articles weren’t selling so I got out but I saw a lot of petty jealousy from the people who were not performing towards those that do.This article clearly influenced by those sorts of sources. Probably these people complaining just didn’t have well performing articles. In my case, the GLV was up front, I knew my articles had to perform to get paid. They didn’t so I stopped writing. Plus too many meetings. But I would never go around trashing others, that’s life, you win some you lose some.

    Seriously- Reading some of these comments is mind boggling. People are saying new people’s ideas were dismissed. Well, I don’t know of any business where you come in and new people’s ideas overtake the existing culture. Have you people ever worked anywhere before? You come in at bottom of barrel and pay dues, then you get influence. That’s life in business world.

    What would have been interesting would have been an expose on the whole pay per click model and an analysis of how it effects writers and writing itself, not a bash session. Seems to me like you are lacking the broader perspective of objectivity. I doubt this article will appeal to anyone not directly involved with GLV.

    • Juana

      Rebecca, is that you?

      • Steve Johnson

        My name is Steven Johnson and I guess you proved my point. This is not an article, just a personal bash session by people with an axe to grind for whatever reason. Believe it or not people have other experiences and perspectives than you.

        • Carol Tice

          In our defense, Steve, we’ve got someone on GLV’s editorial staff who freely admits they create fake social media identities…so you can understand the suspicion.

    • Jonathan Holowka

      ^ Someone has some butthurt.

      “It is also sort of off putting that the people who were the sources of the article are clammering to chime in under the comments section.”

      Yep, I was interviewed and I want to be a part of the conversation. I am a terrible person.

      My pay per hour as Carol pointed out was on average $1.30. For Heather it was 47 cents. I was there for a couple of months and Heather was there for MUCH longer. Writing longer would have NOT paid higher. In fact, I was told flat out when I joined by DiMarkco himself that “the way you are going to make money here is by recruiting a team to work under you.”

      At that point as I said in another comment, you are not a writer. You are a multi-level marketer. The hours I put in were not worth the time. It’s that simple. If I wanted to work for minimum wage I would get a job at McDonalds. I was optimistically naive.

      There was an upside though, I met some great people and I wouldn’t have found Carol’s blog and Jon Morrow’s course if I hadn’t.

      If you have to say “this is not multi-level marketing” then it is multi-level marketing. If you have to say “this is not a scam” then it’s a scam.

      • Carol Tice

        Well, since there is no downline it’s more like it’s …marketing. There’s no multi-level. But the bottom line is still the same – you wanted to be a writer, not an HR recruiter, so you passed.

        • Jonathan Holowka

          Ironically enough I actually studied HR at university and did want to be an HR recruiter at one point.

          But no, that ship sailed so not anymore.

    • Carol Tice

      I don’t have a competing revenue-share platform I want writers to join, Steve, and don’t have an SEO bootcamp in the Den. I don’t even need writers to join the Den — at 1,200 members, it’s really fulfilled all my expectations and more.

      I don’t have a conflict, I have a mission — to help writers earn a living wage. Most revenue-share sites don’t help with that. I was motivated to write this article because of the number of GLV writers I heard from who felt ripped off. It’s a fairly new place, not Squidoo or something, so as I’ve stated farther up, it seemed to serve the writer community to look into GLV’s business model and how they treat writers.

      I’m not in control of who chooses to comment on my blog.

      You say people have other experiences, but oddly enough, it sounds like your GLV experience was much like everyone else’s profiled in the piece. I gave GLV over a week to refer me writers with at least six months’ tenure, who was happy and earning well — and not part of their editorial/recruiting scheme — and they were able to come up with one person out of over 300 writers, who as you read isn’t completely thrilled.

      I was actually hoping there’d be more balance to the story with more current writers reporting positive experiences…but even with GLV’s help, I wasn’t able to turn up more success stories.

      I’ve written about the revshare model at length in the past, and my regular readers have a fair grounding in its pitfalls.

      I’m hoping to do additional pieces in future about some of the other emerging platforms out there, to learn more about how they work. I’m just trying to bring information about opportunities and warnings about scams to readers. That’s been my role since 2008, and I’m not stopping because it comes off like a ‘gripe session’ to someone.

      Over 40,000 writers a month read my blog, and want to learn about the marketplace, so I think the relevance is far beyond writers who’ve worked for GLV. Hopefully, when writers see similar promises on other platforms, this post will help ring a bell in their heads that these sort of setups aren’t usually useful for serious professional writers who need to feed their families with writing income.

    • Silvia

      Come now, let’s not deliver drivel. I have a slew of e-mails where DiMarkco Chandler sent meetings and demands from writers/editors to counter Danyelle’s comment on Carol’s blog that start this whole truth reveal. Not to be crass, but you are full of it.

      The bootcamp is a place where DiMarkco demands several articles on a weekly basis, unpaid. Additionally, the instructors are not paid for teaching the class. They are promised pay of 5 ads- meaning they have to write quite a bit, and hope something goes “viral.”

      There are, perhaps, four, maybe now three solid writers who keep DiMarkco swimming in ad revenue. Basically, he is running a massive blog, with loads of free guest posts, and thanks you for your ignorance. He has no journalists in the field, and has been blacklisted from Google a few times due to the amount of ad-linked malware.

      He has held meetings with senior editors, going insane about how to clear his name. One simply has to review the type of articles, the insane eye-popping block paragraphs to understand there is no real journalism going on here.

      The Tribune openly penned an article on his sham presentation, atop of your aloof leader being arrested for domestic violence earlier this year. This is a modern day corruption- scheme ring, and should be shut down by Google/Bing and any other site directing traffic to it.

      Additionally, I never received a 1099 and when I made an inquiry to a senior manager, I was told the owner has no intention of filing taxes. He may want to check the IRS stance on not issuing 1099’s. So, Steve, if that is your real name, or an alias, do not try to pull the wool over people who have been there, and seen how bad his blog is.

      Carol is not a competitor. She delivers content that is original, delivers results, and most of all – is highly respected in the blog community.

      • Carol Tice

        Silvia, sounds like you had another negative experience at GLV…but I think one experience not getting a 1099 doesn’t necessarily mean a company doesn’t file its taxes. I’d suspect 1099s are not routinely issued at GLV because so few writers are ever going to earn $600, the revenue floor at which 1099s need to be issued. Since earning that amount is so rare, it’s probably handled more case by case.

        • Silvia

          True lol the $600 mark, but when I inquired directly, I was told not to worry about filing, and I made well beyond $600. Then I was told to check PayPal…but I wasn’t paid via PayPal, but by check. I did file anyway, claiming the income. I hope I am wrong about that 😀

          • Carol Tice

            Fascinating story there, Silvia. The whole PayPal situation has created a mess, since the company filing doesn’t know if the contractor will get a tax form from PayPal or not. Since I do get one, I find myself running around telling people to be sure to NOT send me a separate 1099, or it means I’ve declared the income twice! Creates a lot of problems.

            But a company paying by check that tells you to look to PayPal to send you a tax form? That doesn’t add up.

            My sense is there’s a lot of editorial turnover at GLV, so it’s possible you were talking to someone who was misinformed or steered you wrong.

  22. Emily McIntyre

    Wow. Thank you Carol for writing this (10 interviews + research= *lots* of time away from other projects!) and my sympathies with each of the writers and editors who were sucked into this scam. It makes me so sad to read of writers who actually don’t realize they can command fair wages for their work.


    • Carol Tice

      You’re welcome, Emily. That was a real common thread in many of the interviews — writers who were brand-new to freelancing and unaware there were better-paying markets.

  23. Raul

    Coming from someone who is no stranger to freelance work, I can write that GLV is not the scam you are making it out to be. I went to College to become a Graphic Designer. After some years, I went back to school to become a Photographer. All of the work I have ever done is freelance. I am well aware of scams and empty promises. I can write that GLV has promised me nothing but the freedom of writing and some compensation.

    I started the GLV Boot Camp in early April and on DAY ONE was told NOT to expect to make a living from GLV. Most of the first online class was taken up with explaining how getting paid worked and what we had to do make money. The way we got paid was laid out in front of us and we were able to decide to go ahead with it or leave. Of course, I stayed.

    What I was promised was the training and education to become a better writer than I thought I was. The education started with the first article that I wrote during Boot Camp. I submitted the article and received an e-mail from the editor. I was told specifically what my writing needed to become a great article and was given tips on how to improve. I chose to take that criticism and use it as an educational tool.

    After Boot Camp I was place on Rebecca Savastio’s writing team. Savastio has been nothing but open about her support of our writing. She makes herself available for questions and responds almost immediately whenever possible. During my time on her team, she has in no way tried to “sell” me on GLV or promised me anything beyond the help of become a better writer. Savastio has not taught us any tricks or schemes beyond self-promotion. During her weekly team meetings, she has gone through the payroll system multiple times and offers any help to get paid. She wants her team members to be paid and she stresses the steps on how to do so. I understand that you need villains to make your article entertaining, but Rebecca Savastio is far from the scoundrel you make her out to be.

    I understand that people want to be paid, yet their level of writing does not prove that much worth. Do I think I should be paid handsomely for the articles I have written so far? Barely. I am still in the beginning stages and have to work my way forward.

    GLV is about the freedom to write. I have written articles where I have done my own research and done my own footwork. Around Easter, I did a full article about the Egg-stravaganza egg hunt at Disneyland and Disney California Adventure. That article came from me visiting the parks, participating in the egg hunt, visiting all the attractions, and then going home and writing about it. I mean, come on, that was fun. And GLV wants to pay me for writing about my fun? Yes, please.

    Do I think your article will help people decide about GLV? Sure.
    Do I think GLV is a scam? Nope.
    Is GLV an underdog? Perhaps.
    Was I told what to expect from GLV? Sure was.
    Is what I expected happening? Yup.

    GLV is not for everyone and everyone is not for GLV. Take GLV for what it is and enjoy the writing that comes from it.

    Wow. I just wrote over 550 words on your blog. And I did it for free. Boy, do I feel scammed.

    • Jonathan Holowka

      Hey Raul,

      You started in early May so it sounds like you’ve been writing for about the same amount of time (currently) as I had when I chose to leave.

      You mentioned that GLV gives you freedom to write, but that isn’t necessarily true. You have to maintain a monthly quota of at least two articles. If you don’t maintain that quota then you no longer earn revenue from any of the articles you have written. That means all your work you are doing now will be for naught when you stop.

      Freedom to write is easy to get. All you have to do is start a blog and you have all the freedom in the world to write what you want, whenever you want. I’ve written far less for my personal blog I started after leaving and have earned far more. In fact, over seven times more at this point. Having this type of freedom, maintaining full ownership of my content and making that much more is a far better deal than anything GLV offered. All I’ve done to promote what I wrote in this blog was use social media. If I can do it, so can anyone.

      I agree with you that the people there are supportive. The best thing that came out of GLV for me was some of the connections I made. I met some really great people and am still in touch with many of them. However, almost all of them have also quit for one reason or another and I haven’t seen any of them regretting those decisions either.

      While there, I was an editor and provided feedback to others on their articles so I do know first hand about the training and support that was there, such as the kind you have received.

      However, you can find that training and support elsewhere too. I know that Carol’s mailing list has some great advice. If you come over to my website, I have some too on how you can achieve self-promotion.

      You clearly have things you enjoy writing about, as do I. Why would you want someone else to own that content and take more than half your earnings when you could write for yourself, and keep everything that you create and earn? Personally, I like this option far better.

    • Carol Tice

      All I can say, Raul, is nearly every single person who told us GLV was great on a post thread 90 days ago, who had recently joined, has now quit. Come on back in July or so and tell us if you’re still loving writing for GLV.

      I’m glad your training experience at least made it clear what was on offer…hopefully GLV is getting better at making sure writers understand exactly what the pay situation is from the start.

  24. Willi Morris

    So, I have this terrible habit of wanting to resolve problems as soon as I encounter them. And unfortunately, this meant getting out of bed, putting on some clothes and making tea in this case, because it’s so late.

    I don’t like being super blunt, but here’s the thing:

    If you have ever worked or are currently working for a site like GLV, you are being scammed. Plain and simple. If you don’t feel as though you are being scammed, congratulations – you are also being brainwashed.

    For instance, if you include time for research and interviews, I’m making around $25-$50 an hour minimum freelance writing. I don’t even think I’ve written 100 articles in the past *two* years – for my blog, or any one else’s. And I’m not some ultra fancy freelance writer – I’m an ex-journalist who still has a very long way to go before I’m considered a huge success.

    But I’ve hustled. And the training you can get is free – on this site and many others. I have a list of places for *free* training on my own web site, because I use them all the time myself.

    This is not Carol attempting to sway you to join her Den. She has plenty of good advice right here for free on her site. (I include her site in my list of resources -http://www.myfreelancelife.com/free-business-resources/)

    Bottom line – if they are asking for a quota, you are being scammed. If you aren’t getting bylines, you are being scammed…I can’t emphasize enough to you how horrible this is. This is essentially an online writing sweat shop and it needs to be stopped. If you are a part of this organization and any others, get out. Now. Start your own blog using WordPress or some other free site and show off your talent to people on your own.

    You are much better off getting paid nothing but have your own work to show for it than getting paid these abysmal amunts.

    • Willi Morris

      I apologize for the typos, but it’s almost 11:25 p.m., I don’t have my glasses, and I’m ranting a bit.

  25. Alex J. Rhowuniong

    Carol, thanks for the warning. Sad to see folks conned like that.

    But you know there are many writers from third world countries that wouldn’t mind writing for that kind of pay. And that kills us too…

    Now, come to think of it, it’s possible there might be some in the mix that stay who passed his bootcamp.

    • Carol Tice

      My sense is that ESL writers are definitely part of the mix at GLV, as you could see from the sentences I quoted above.

  26. Danyelle C. Overbo

    So glad to see this come out, Carol! Great piece. Thank you so much for including our stories and for warning others away from this freelancing scam. When you first start out, you are just so vulnerable. I wish I’d found Make A Living Writing first, then I would never have wasted my time with that site! Thank goodness you’re out here, Carol, fighting the good fight!

    • Carol Tice

      Thanks for being willing to share your story, Danyelle — it’s what really made this piece possible.

  27. Jackie

    I too was sucked in by the owner of GLV, DiMarkco Chandler. I made very little money while with GLV and was promised, like others (including at least one person who denies it in this article), an ownership interest in the company for all of my dedication and hard work. Obviously, that never happened.

    Not only do writers make very little, but it is also more difficult than it should be to get the money that they do make. Writers are regularly forced to make multiple requests to receive the money that they are owed at which time they may or may not recieve it. The idea that DiMarkco makes less than his writers is absurd. I don’t see any GLV writers making enough to afford a large new home, luxury car, diamond jewelry and expensive vacations for their spouses (all of which his wife has flaunted on social media in recent months).

    I would recommend avoiding this content mill at all costs.

    As an aside, the comment about housewives and people with nothing to do is nothing but sexist ass-hattery.

  28. Angie Johnston

    There are so many garbage traps that new writers get sucked into, and it’s such a shame that people want to take advantage of them. Occasionally I’ll hire a copywriter to help me out with a project, and the stories I’ve heard are atrocious. It’s really sad, and you’ve done a big service to new writers by putting in all the hours necessary to get the real story. 🙂

  29. Ashley Nance

    This sounds exactly like my experience with Examiner.com! Very few differences from what you write here, except Examiner splits it up locally, so they can make it feel like they’re a specialized local news site where you can write articles in the vertical of your choice and actually make a difference in your community. In reality, unless you’re one of their chosen spokeswriters, you only get hits from traffic you drive to the site yourself. I wrote a good sample and two excellent articles, all for about $0.25 total. And I didn’t even get that – because you had to earn a certain amount before they actually paid you. At least it only took me two articles to do my research – a writer from No Job For Mom gave a great review that helped me know I was not alone. Now I know!

  30. Lindsay Wilson

    Wow. This site sounds even slimier than a content mill. At least with Textbroker you definitely will get paid. $10 an article sucks, but $200 total is a heck of a lot better than 20 artices free! Thanks for doing the digging for us, Carol.

  31. Anthony

    So, people going through bootcamp and meetings while working at GLV were told about you and this article… and in case you were wondering, they’re being told that it’s all about misquotes, disgruntled former workers and other negative things.

    Sadly, and as much as it hurts my heart to admit, it’s all very much true. I’m departing the site at the end of the month with over 110,000 views on my articles and about $120 to show for it.

    If anyone is reading this article — or Jonathan’s article, which I’ve also read — mark my words: DO NOT WORK FOR THE GUARDIAN LIBERTY VOICE. You will end up heartbroken and without much to show for it.

    Off to look for something else….

    • Carol Tice

      Hi Anthony —

      Thanks for letting me know what the chatter is back at GLV!

      It’s easy to say, “Oh, those are disgruntled writers…” but there do seem to be so very many of those disgruntled writers, and I think that tells you what you need to know.

  32. Andy Towle

    Thank you for the article. I appreciate your efforts and research that went into it. I worked for GLV for about two months after Boot Camp. That’s when I did the math and realized I was making about a penny an article. Go figure.

    I was surprised I worked that long. I saw it as an opportunity to learn how to use SEO techniques to find readers. Not so much.

    It was an eye opener into the current trend on the internet however. It seems that most places I’ve applied are similar in that they want the copy, but do not want to pay a person for their research, time, and honest struggle to do the writing.

    Still writing, still looking for reliable and honest companies.

    • Carol Tice

      Hi Andy — sorry to hear about your GLV experience! You can take a look in the sidebar here for my list of 140 websites that mostly pay at least $50 a post, guaranteed. That should be a better starting point for you.

      You might also check out my ebook on How to Get Great Freelance Clients…it would help you understand how to spot scams, avoid them, and find legitimate, good-paying prospects to pitch your services. I hate how much writer time is wasted in speculative revshare or low-paid mill work, where it’s never going to add up to a living.

  33. Tabs

    I started writing for GLV in late May this year. I did my homework beforehand and went in fully knowing the reputation that it has. I wanted to see for myself, I was also simply curious as to what the deal was.

    I wrote 350 plus articles from June to October. I probably made less than $50. (because I quit early, I will not have been paid for most of these as there is a 50 day payroll lag.

    I also trained as an editor for them, started editing, and stopped when I was working about 6-8 hours a day for a stipend of $140 (which by the way, was promised and did not ever make it as far as my Paypal account.)

    I left on good terms with the editing staff there, because like I said, I knew what I was getting into and I made some great connections with other editors in the long run. Most of who left around the same time that I did. Incidentally, it is these other people with whom I have joined in a collaborate writer focused effort called Tellus.

    Anyone who has been stung by GLV and still wants to write, but doesn’t want to line DiMarkco’s pockets should contact the people over at tellusnewsdigest.com.

    GLV is a SCAM! I can say that from a writer and editors point of view. Most of the people there do not even know that they are being scammed. Its quite funny the way that the couple of people who have been there and continue to drink the Cool Aid are blind to this; its also rather sad.

    • Carol Tice

      Sorry to hear you earned so little on GLV, Tabitha! That’s an average $7 an article.

      Tell us more about the pay model at Tellus, and the sort of writer pay you’re offering.

  34. Isaiah Kuhle

    Thank you for writing this post, Carol. You just saved me from a lot of pointless work.

    • Isaiah Kuhle

      Thank you to all the editors and writers who contributed their experiences as well.

  35. Michael Schultheiss

    This article helped inform my own decision to break with GLV, and I wanted to publicly thank Carol for it.

    Here’s a bit about my story: I joined in March of 2014, and quickly distinguished myself in boot camp. There was a lot of turnover at the time (and now I understand why), so I was able to work my way up through the ranks with considerable rapidity. About two months after completing boot camp, I was installed as editor of the science section, which I loved.

    Of course, my articles never made any real money. Like so many others, I made pocket change, and the small matter of my editor’s stipend remained in limbo for months. I kept plugging away because I believed in the company, and I was working with some truly great people (who, as it turned out, were also duped by GLV).

    My seemingly endless commitments to GLV left me worn out and frustrated, particularly since I was not being compensated at anything close to a reasonable rate, editor’s stipend included. This article helped me to realize the con job GLV is pulling on their writers, and I knew I could not be a part of that even if they were compensating me appropriately. I waited until my (long overdue) first payout from my editor’s stipend was actually in my bank, and then I quit.

    Again, I’d like to thank you, Carol, for this article. It is a true public service, and I hope it helps many more writers see GLV for what it really is.

    • Carol Tice

      Sorry you were caught up in this, Michael! Here’s to finding better-paying markets.

  36. Michelle Estes

    Thank you so much for doing this expose. Chandler is still trying to con new freelancers like myself into working for GLV (he currently has a job post on Indeed.com). I wanted to find out more about his company before I signed up for the bootcamp. I’m so glad I did. Thanks to you I won’t be working for nothing. You just gained a new fan and follower.

    • Carol Tice

      Glad you saw this, Michelle! I’m sure he will continue advertising, since most writers leave quickly, and his model requires a lot of content.

  37. Silvy

    I was astounded by DiMarkco’s treatment during training. It was so unprofessional and horribly wasteful. He said only an hour, it went 4! I quit during it, after writing 10 articles of which I never made a penny. We are talking 600-850 words. Sick, deplorable organization, so I was even more angry when I was contacted by a “manager” on his site to write for his NEW site: http://thepublicslate.com/ The Public Slate- stay away from this one too writers!! It looks like DiMarkco is up to shady tricks since this expose ruined him!

    • Carol Tice

      Hi Silvy —

      Sorry you had this experience.

      When I asked DiMarkco how he was going to keep pageviews from eroding on a per-writer basis as he hired hundreds more writers, he did explain to me that part of his plan was to shunt writers to some of his other sites. But as you say, in the end it’s all the same pay model which for most ends up paying only pennies.

      GLV still seems to be around — I don’t think I’ve toppled an empire or anything. But I’m glad I was able to research and write this, for writers who are wondering what it’s like to write for them.

  38. Priscilla and her Books

    I knew it’s too good to be true. I came across the ad on ProBlogger Job Board. I did a quick Google search and I found your post. Boy, am I glad I didn’t sign up for the program!

  39. Mary

    Hi Carol,

    Have you done any research in the Canadian-based website called Digital Journal? If so, can you share your views – or even better, write an article?


  40. MikesFilmTalk

    Hi Carol,

    Wow, the expose that just won’t die. I’m not writing to add to the long list of complaints, I just wanted you to know that I’ve linked this article along with your “about” page to an article I’m writing about working at GLV. I will say it took an old dog a long time to realise that the whole thing was an illusion, although to be fair I never fell for the team building rubbish as I just wanted to write. I’ll send you a link when it’s up later today, Just a heads up and a “well done” for a well researched article.


    • Carol Tice

      Feel free to share it in our CommentLuv tool if you can — if it’s in the comment I may have to dig it out of spam.

  41. MikesFilmTalk

    Okay Carol, here’s the link via the commentluv tool. If there is anyone left out there who wonders about some of the things “behind the scenes” this will answer a few questions.


    • Carol Tice


    • Laurie Swenson

      Thanks for sharing that. What a strange and creepy place/management.

  42. Stacie

    I met Chandler last month at a college event, yes I said college. My daughter had been interested in writing and we visited him and he referred us to: guardianlv.com/bloom-form/ (copy and paste into address bar)

    Something about him rubbed me in the “mom check this out for Megan way.” So I did, and here I am. It is incredibly creepy for me, as a mother to know my daughter very close to coming into contact with this character. Always Google what you feel may not be write. Thank you for writing this. If anyone can tell me how I can report this creep for falsifying a college, I would appreciate it!

    • Carol Tice

      Not sure how he is ‘falsifying a college,’ but glad you found this post, Stacie! Your daughter might want to check out my Step by Step ebook or writers’ community, Freelance Writers Den, for resources on how to find legit clients that will pay a guaranteed amount rather than speculative pennies based on pageviews. See the tabs at the top of this page.

      • Michael Smith

        The “college” the mum is referring to is the Guardian Liberty Voice Institute. Set up as a training ground for writers and being used to fund an essay writing contest aimed at school kids from elementary school up. This was the latest avenue taken by GLV’s publisher and one that I had no interest in.

        • Carol Tice

          Aha! Sounds like a recruiting tool.

  43. rafa

    Quick (and very late) question about GLV. Is the training at least informative? I am a writer and am curious to know if I could get at least SOMETHING valuable out of a two week training stint with the group. I am a traditional writer but would like to leap into the online space. I don’t mind writing the 20 articles for free. That sounds rather painless to me if I’m actually learning some SEO skills. Or should I just invest in some SEO books and vids?Any input would be appreciated. Thanks!

    • Carol Tice

      The feedback I got from the former GLV writers I interviewed is that their training was simplistic and rapidly going out of date, thanks to Google’s many changes. That they spend hours waiting around while individuals were taught to log in and view their dashboard…that there was a lot of timewasting.

      DiMarcko freely shared with me how GLV’s traffic dive-bombed after one recent Google algorithm change, and how he had to remove many ads to get back up in rankings, impacting their revenue dramatically. Obviously, that trend isn’t going to help him pay writers more.

      The problem is, Google hates mass, quickie-junk content with a lot of ads slapped all around it. That’s not going to change. The whole model of what they do is increasingly difficult to succeed at, because Google is onto the business model of junk content, and that it doesn’t provide readers much value.

      Let me give you a free training right here and save you 2 weeks of your life:

      Key words matter, but SEO is a dying art, generally. Value of content, length of content, and how often that content is shared and commented on are gaining in Google’s eyes. Just write great stuff we haven’t seen before, with key words in headlines so your target reader can find it, and you’ll do fine.

      • Rafael

        Fantastic. Thanks for the quick reply. You saved me two weeks.

  44. Stevenson Benoit

    Thanks for this. I wish I would have read this 2 months ago. At least than, I would have a bigger picture of what I was getting myself into. I learned a few things to incorporate in my own private writing ventures though so it was not all in vain lol.

  45. Michael Smith

    Well Carol, it looks like the GLV empire is tumbling. A leaked email, along the lines of Sony’s recent communication hack, has shown just how far the lies went. A fellow writer at GLV, Stevenson Benoit, has started a series of articles pointing out the things listed in the leaked emails. Here is my latest article on the dangers of writing for the Internet and looking at the emails? Most likely not my last.

    Again, I’ve referenced your article here –


    • Carol Tice

      I see his ping — sounds like the end may be the same one that got Al Capone: taxes.

  46. Cynthia Collins

    I left Guardian Liberty Voice (GLV) in early 2015. I was with the company for two years as one of the senior ranking editors.

    No company can survive without communication. It doesn’t matter the number of employees, how frequent the turnover, or how long people stay. If there is no communication, there is no company. That leaves only a group of people, each doing their own thing and reporting to someone who doesn’t seem interested in the concerns and questions of those who are working for him.

    Most of the problems at GLV were/are the result of a lack of communication, lack of integrity and lack of professionalism by the owner/publisher. Writers and editors heard conflicting answers to the same question. Promises never panned out nor was there any explanation or apology. Contrary to some of the comments from your readers, senior editors were often just as much in the dark about the sudden reason why a contest was shut down or why someone was no longer with the company as the rest of the writers. No matter how many times we requested a group meeting, the end result was always the same: either 1) no response or 2) an isolated response or 3) a company-wide meeting that did not deal with the issues but announced yet another contest or something that sounded good but never happened. It was a tangled web of alternating silence and excuses.

    Also, senior editors at GLV did not have it financially easy. It is true that we got stipends, but they were based on various rules which changed frequently. Contracts did not seem to matter and revised contracts were never finished. For example, I was promised a revised contract last summer but by the time I resigned in early January 2015, the contract still had not materialized. Different rules applied to different people and the editors, especially those of us at the most senior level, were invariably the last to know.

    Some of us were told we were late-stage co-founders which meant we were supposed to get equity in the company. That also never happened. If anyone brought it up with the publisher, we were told how the company didn’t have enough money. He would suddenly have all these new duties we were supposed to do, which meant working longer hours. It didn’t matter what the rules were, there was always something else added. As indicated by the comments here, writers often paid the price with their health, peace of mind, and family time.

    Writing for GLV was supposed to be freelance and writers had the option to select anywhere from writing two articles a month up to several per day based on whether they wanted to work at this part-time or full-time. Unfortunately, even those who selected part-time were told they had to attend daily meetings held during regular business hours. Part of their pay became based on if they showed up for these meetings. For writers who already had day jobs, this was difficult if not impossible to do. These daily meetings were just a waste of time because the publisher rarely showed up.

    The reader who expressed concern about the “college” is absolutely correct. It is not unusual for newspapers to hold essay contests or offer scholarships, but the publisher of GLV is claiming his training program is becoming accredited. He is also claiming he will be awarding scholarships and a new car. During my time with GLV, the Liberty Voice Institute was never accredited by any state department of education.

    After writers are accepted to the required boot camp course, any articles written and published on the GLV site remain the property of the company even after the writer leaves. Once writers resign, they no longer get whatever royalties their articles generate but the publisher continues to make money off of those same articles. In order for writers to keep getting royalties, they essentially can never resign.

    I personally can’t imagine any student taking this “course.” It is not a real school and students won’t have time to do their school work with all the demands of this boot camp. In my opinion, showing up at job fairs and attempting to sign students up for a non-existent “campus” is just another way of attempting to increase the site’s total number of articles. Parents and teachers need to ask lots of questions in advance and not become swayed by a smooth-talking salesman attempting to convince them to accept something that makes them uncomfortable.

    On the subject of integrity, to quote Shakespeare, “therein lies the rub.” Integrity, just like communication, must exist throughout the entire company including the top. You can’t have writers doing their best when the publisher is busy making isolated exceptions to his rules, not telling anyone about his exceptions, spreading conflicting stories about the same situation or the same person, and sitting back amused at this chronic state of chaos.

    The company used to be a nice place before greed took over. When the publisher decided to push for 900 writers (which he never got) and the pending bin had 60 or more articles waiting for editing, it stopped being a nice, friendly place. The deception took place for some writers early on while it took longer to unravel for others.

    The last thing I’d like to say is that GLV recently added the Better Business Bureau logo at the bottom of its website saying it is “accredited” by the BBB. (Accredited in this sense doesn’t mean honest). Past and present GLV writers who have not received the pay they were promised can use the BBB as one way of reporting the problem.

    Thank you.

    • Carol Tice

      Thanks for sharing your perspective, Cynthia.

  47. James

    I began working for the Guardian in 2012. I averaged 12 articles per day, seven days a week. I wasn’t paid; it was a ‘start-up.’ In 2012 I was the managing editor until the first part of 2013. I began at 4:30 in the morning editing and did not finish until about 7 p.m.; all the while writing and editing. I did’t make one dollar an hour.

    I was asked to come back at the end of last year, (2014), and get the Public Slate on track. I have been getting paid, but I don’t believe it will last.

    You can check out the 100’s of articles I wrote for the Guardian Liberty Voice and the Public Slate to check out my story. Just type “James Turnage” in the search box at the top.

    • Carol Tice

      Hi James —

      Thanks for sharing your story. Glad you’re finally getting some pay, but it’s hard to think it could ever make up for the volume of nearly free writing services you ‘donated’ in the past.

  48. Rebecca Savastio

    Hello, I would like to let all of the writers know that there is a way to retrieve any unpaid monies owed to them. If you are or were a writer for GLV and you have not been paid money owed to you after repeated attempts to collect it from the company, you can file a complaint with the Southern Nevada BBB online. Unfortunately, I had to go this route after the company stopped paying me what was owed. I was able to retrieve a partial payment for some of what was promised, but not all of it. I am still working on getting the rest of what I was told I would receive. Like many writers here it took me a long time to see DiMarkco Chandler’s true colors because he is a master manipulator who is extraordinarily skilled at fooling people. His con artistry is so detailed, so practiced, that even a skeptic like me was completely bamboozled. I apologize to anyone who was hurt by my inability to see through DiMarkco’s facade in a timely fashion. I can’t even describe the extreme depth and breadth of this man’s manipulation, and in saying that, I hope to clear my name of any intentional wrongdoing, on my part, to any writer on the site. I was never “in bed” with DiMarkco; I never intended to harm anyone. I have been a victim just as all the rest of you were. Please consider going after the money that is owed to you via the BBB. If you do so please remember that GLV is legally a membership organization, NOT an employer. The BBB does not handle employment complaints. When I submitted my complaint, I made sure I clicked that it was not an employment complaint and then I also clarified in my written complaint that GLV is a member organization, as stated clearly in all of our contracts. The complaint went through, and because of it, Bonito finally paid me a little bit of what GLV owes to me. You can do the same and I hope you are able to recover some of the money owed to you. Please also be wary of new ads DiMarkco is placing for a “university scholarship” and “essay contest” for journalists which he is charging money for. He has also set up many new publications, so run in the other direction from The Public Slate, Liberty Voice University, Headliners Today, Frackle Media, MARScocial and any “newspaper” or “writing opportunity” with his name on it. He also has Twitter handles that make it seem as though he is the CEO of the NY Times and other big publishing companies. Just be very careful not to fall into the trap of this man a second time, and for any new person reading this please understand that this is not just bad press or a bunch disgruntled ex employees, as I once mistakenly thought it was. This is real, and DiMarkco really hurts people. Please stay away from him. Good luck to one and all.

    • Carol Tice

      Hi Rebecca — I’m sorry to hear it all turned out the same for you as for so many others. Thanks for posting these tips for anyone who is seeking compensation from GLV.

  49. Michael

    This is an absolutely amazing post that must have required a lot of work! Much respect for what you have provided many new and old freelance writers.

    I have been a full-time web writer for over 5 years. Over that time, I have worked on and off on a blog focused on helping other writers succeed online. One of the ways I do this is with freelance writing site reviews. So I had planned on joining GLV and seeing how it went. Mostly as fodder for the blog review, but I was honestly intrigued by the “bootcamp” aspect even though I was well aware of the ad revenue payment model.

    Well, I guess it is a good thing that my experience was cut short by inept handling of my first Skype meeting. In short, the scheduled bootcamp time was wrong and when I finally received a message from the lady apparently responsible for gathering all the “students” together, she was less than qualified to establish or interact in a one-on-one Skype call much less the conference variety. Considering that my daily schedule isn’t exactly free and clear, I decided to move on to the paying work I was putting aside to learn about GLV.

    Thank you for making it clear that I’m not missing a whole lot. Now, time to feature and discuss your article with my readers. Hopefully we can steer new writers in a better, more lucrative direction!

  50. Jeff Wetherington

    Thanks so much for all the hard work you put into exposing this racket. I found your article after seeing a post for GLV on the ProBlogger Job board this morning, [Comment rules won’t let me list the URL], which I found to be very sad. Lots of people put their faith in the veracity of the listings on the board and may not bother to check out the posting. I\’m glad I did, and that you had the information exposing them for all to find.

    • Carol Tice

      Jeff, I’ve found the ProBlogger board pretty spotty. They post a lot of very low-paying gigs. But I agree with you — not happy to see them taking a GLV ad. But it’s a profit center for them, they take paid ads…and let their audience decide. That’s just how Darren rolls with that.

      I have a different approach and we’re super-selective about what we put up on the Freelance Writers Den job board (nothing under $50 a post or $100 an article)…and you know what? Some junk STILL seems to skate by us. It’s hard to police. If they hadn’t read this article, how are they to tell it from the 100s of other revshare offers out there?

  51. Rachel Woodruff

    This article made my whole day better. I was one of the writers suckered into writing for the GLV and I am so glad that this is out there to warn other authors so that they don’t waste time and resources to line DiMarkco’s pocket. I was told when I asked for my money that I “must not have been very good if you didn’t get paid”, in the end I lost a friend over it and felt very betrayed.

    • Carol Tice

      Unfortunately, I’ve heard way too many stories like this about GLV.

      When I first heard about it, I had high hopes, because there are so few markets that pay for political commentary. It was disappointing to discover it was just another revenue-share for pennies situation…and now we’re hearing about people not even being paid the pittance they were promised. I’m sorry it didn’t turn out to be a bigger market, but glad I have this info out for writers who might be thinking about writing for them.

  52. Jacob

    as a current employee of GLV I am shocked by these testimonies. I make plenty of money at GLV. I’ve made $1.60 in the past four months/ 47 articles. how many ramen noodles does that buy?

    • Carol Tice

      I’ll assume you’re being sarcastic, Jacob…and I’m hoping you’re kidding about how little you’ve made off that many articles!

  53. Courtney

    Every bit of this is true. I’ve been out for over a year now and decided to see how the site was doing…same content mill click bait. The sports section had the best quality of writing when I was there, but like all sections, it lacked consistency in just about every facet of what constitutes responsible journalism.
    Turn-over rate of writers/editors was absolutely absurd. The majority of the articles up on the site now are from boot campers in all likelihood. As a former “senior” editor (we never got stipends), I too was promised a stake. Unlike a lot of the poor souls that got sucked into this vat of faux journalism, I wasn’t really in it for the money. I had to get out when they started border-line harassing me to shed more blood and sweat sans compensation. All around predatory scam that targets young writers who don’t know any better. Chandler gets an all around F in the proverbial “quality human being” department.


  1. Grounded Parents - […] as much ideologically driven as it was hurried, I can’t help but think that the Guardian’s “boot-camp” program, in…
  2. 5 Writing Tricks You Can Swipe from the Professional Journalist's Playbook - […] way is to interview interesting people. Do a bunch of interviews on one topic, and you can even write…
  3. Freelance Writers: Beware the Scammers (The GLV Experience) - […] freelance writer and blogger, Carol Tice; wrote an expose on the Guardian Liberty Voice, the publication that caught me…
  4. Entrepreneurs: The New Con? Writing for the Internet - […] I’ve written a couple of articles about my time at the GLV and Carol Tice wrote an incredibly well…
  5. Guardian Liberty Voice Important Info for Writers - […] at the Guardian Liberty Voice, they began flocking online to tell their stories. This led to a lengthy expose…

Related Posts

A Look Inside Den 2x Success Stories

The Freelance Writers Den is the online community where freelance writers learn how to grow their income -- fast. Inside the community, there are two levels: The Freelance Writers Den is for freelancers who are just getting started, learning the basics, and giving...